It’s strange, because like THE LAUREL-HARDY MURDER CASE before it, the story of OLIVER THE EIGHTH seems like a good idea, but for whatever reason Laurel and Hardy just could not pull it off as well as one might imagine. That’s not to say OLIVER THE EIGHTH is a bad film, as I do think that there are some funny moments, but as far as shorts go, it seems as though Laurel and Hardy worked a lot better with simple ideas than more complex ones like this.
Among my favorite moments are the classic “Tell me that again” bit, Mae Busch surprised at Stan’s arrival, and the moments with Laurel and the fun, especially when he inadvertently tricks Hardy into letting him shoot his foot. The invisible cards gag seems funny at first, but they definitely go overboard with it when it comes to the invisible food gags. I’m not super fond of that part in HALF WITS HOLIDAY either, but at least there it actually makes sense as far as the story goes and had Curly been in better health, I feel as though it could have been a lot funnier with his over-the-top reactions. Here, it just feels like filler; this story easily could have been told as a two-reeler, but they instead decided to rely on this rather unfunny bit to pad it out.
Mae Busch gives an excellent performance as usual and Jack Barty’s OK as the butler too. As a whole, OLIVER THE EIGHTH is an OK comedy; not one of their best, but there’s still a decent amount of funny moments throughout.
7 out of 10
Also, thanks for the explanation about the gold brick. I couldn’t figure out the joke the first time I watched and like Freddie Sanborn, I eventually just assumed it was a fake. Looking back, though, Stan does mention the gold standard, so there at least was some attempt to explain the joke even back then.