ROLLING DOWN TO RENO starts at 15:45 in the above video.
IMDB:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0171703/Emil Sitka's diary entry:
http://www.emilsitka.com/rollingdowntoreno1947.htmlROLLING DOWN TO RENO is a remake/reworking, with stock footage, of Buster Keaton's PARDON MY BERTH MARKS, as such, I now direct you to the thread for PARDON MY BERTH MARKS. There, you will see what we said then, and frankly in most regards this short is the exact same.
https://moronika.com/forums/index.php/topic,5947.0.htmlThe lead-up to the train adventure is slightly different in this one, as Harry boldly announces on the radio that he has dirt on a gangster that he will soon turn over to the district attorney, but he is actually lying and just making big talk. From here on out, it is a scene-by-scene remake of the original. Now, it's different indeed as Harry von Zell has a very different approach than Buster Keaton does, but both try their best with what they have.
Like the original, the supporting cast is made up of Columbia's best: Kenneth MacDonald, Christine McIntyre, Symona Boniface, Heinie Conklin, Emil Sitka, Dudley Dickerson, etc. Kenneth MacDonald, we all know by now, is in my opinion the best supporting actor Columbia pictures ever had, and he knocks it out of the park again in this one. Christine McIntyre was never just a dish and always had charm. Symona and Heinie always deliver no matter what they're given. Emil Sitka plays a grouch on the train who just keeps getting his head bashed, and he always delivers with relish.
But how did Kenneth MacDonald board a moving train? Did I miss something explaining how he got on when he said he was going to be waiting for it in Reno?
But, again, we see the voyeurism seen in the original short, and it does make much of this short difficult to enjoy. Especially when it's revealed in the first reel that Harry and Christine are NOT married. Other than this, it's just a solid comfort food Columbia short, and I realize now that I was much too harsh on the original.
It's always fun for me to come across these remakes. When I watch a short to review it, I always avoid reading plot summaries and others reviews until after I have viewed the short so that I am seeing it for the first time much like a movie-goer in the 1930s-1950s would have seen it. In this short's case, I recognized it as a remake well before the end, but doing it this way makes it much easier to enjoy what turns out to be a stock job.
7/10