Moronika

General Boards => General Discussion => Topic started by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 10, 2015, 01:10:58 PM

Title: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 10, 2015, 01:10:58 PM
 The title explains what this thread is trying to get at. Honestly, I feel like Our Gang or The Little Rascals or whatever the heck you want to call it is underlooked and thought of as a kids show. But, it's more for adults than it is for kids!
 But, people appreciate the talkies except have no idea that there was ever any Our Gang silent movies! They deserve some credit! After all, both Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy were in the silent before they teamed up..  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 So, yeah, feel free to give me your thoughts on Spanky, Alfalfa, Farina, Stymie, Buckwheat, Darla, and the rest of the Gang.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 10, 2015, 07:50:51 PM
Who is your favorite silent Our Gang character?  What do you like most about the Our Gang/Little Rascals comedies?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 10, 2015, 08:01:36 PM
Who is your favorite silent Our Gang character?  What do you like most about the Our Gang/Little Rascals comedies?
I like probably Mickey Daniels or Joe Cobb, because of their physical expressions. They are flawless. I also like Allen " Farina" Hoskins, especially the ones made when he was a little baby! What I like most about the comedies is the fact that they are movies that can still go strong today, and that you can reflect back on the movies and remember, " Oh! I remember when I did something similar to that when I was a kid!" and it can help you remember memories you would've never remembered. It's also the fact that the children are so cute and that they're able to act like adults and not over-act ( unless you count early-40's Spanky).
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 10, 2015, 10:59:13 PM
I doubt I could choose a favorite character, not from the silent and not from the talkies.  I enjoy seeing each child for different reasons, although there are some things about one or another character which I find especially amusing or appealing or entertaining. 

I like to see the children most when they are at their most natural.  Of course, some of them were pros at portraying natural characters.  They're all so cute, and they're so funny, too.  When I was little, I had a hard time with the poor quality sound on many of the shorts.  I watch the Rascals about once a week now, the first time I've seen them since I was a child, and I notice that they sound quality is often not good, and other times, the dialogue is almost drowned out by the soundtrack.  That's probably what bothered me when I was young. 

Yet I think I enjoy the Rascals much more now than I did then.  I think it's because I know more about human nature than I did then.  I watched a *lot* of TV when I was growing up, and there were many things, in TV shows and in old movies, which I assumed were just to keep the plot moving.  But now I can see that many of those things are representative of human nature - - *and* to keep the plot moving. 

Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on February 11, 2015, 09:12:59 AM
Not much an Our Gang expert, but I'll say the two shorts that have always stood out to me are CHOO-CHOO! and THE KID FROM BORNEO.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 11, 2015, 11:16:29 AM
Not much an Our Gang expert, but I'll say the two shorts that have always stood out to me are CHOO-CHOO! and THE KID FROM BORNEO.

Have you seen the silent "Choo Choo?"  I can't remember the title just now, but the children seem even wilder in that silent version, and their escort has a different demeanor to the one in the talkie.

"The Kid From Borneo" made a huge impression on me.  I remember laughing myself sick over that one.  I saw it again not long ago, and it's still funny.  I think, "Yum, yum, eat 'em up!" must be in the American lexicon thanks to that short. 

How about "Birthday Blues?"  Do you remember that one with the cake that goes, "weeeeep- WOW!"?  That made an impression on me, too, way back when.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 11, 2015, 04:00:32 PM
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-edpoUayKuRY%2FVNuGhtVXngI%2FAAAAAAABR9A%2F3u5sPCxT7gI%2Fs1600%2FThe%252BLittle%252BRascals%252C%252Bca.%252B1930s.jpg&hash=86f5e742e679371e72bf0a21e78bae7b3d31955b)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 12, 2015, 06:14:43 AM
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-edpoUayKuRY%2FVNuGhtVXngI%2FAAAAAAABR9A%2F3u5sPCxT7gI%2Fs1600%2FThe%252BLittle%252BRascals%252C%252Bca.%252B1930s.jpg&hash=86f5e742e679371e72bf0a21e78bae7b3d31955b)
HA! Being the Our Gang fan I am, I have tried to identify everyone in the picture ( from the top row, left to right): Dorothy DeBorba, Dickie Moore, Matthew " Stymie" Beard, Tommy "Butch" Bond and George "Spanky" McFarland. ( the people sitting, left to right): Not sure whom that first person is, but I'm almost positive that girl is Stymie's sister.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 12, 2015, 09:38:23 AM
The two children who are sitting are Thomas McFarland (Spanky's brother), and Bobbie Beard (Stymie's brother).  Thomas appeared in some of the LR shorts and was known as Dynamite while Bobbie also appeared in some shorts and was known as Cotton (Stymie came up with this nickname for him).  They appeared as extras not featured players.

S-I-A, have you seen the TV show, "You Asked For It" where five of the silent stars appeared in a very brief reunion in 1953?  They were Mickey, Farina, Joe, Jackie and Johnny.  I think the host was awful, and their appearance was much too short, but it was interesting if only for curiosity's sake.  I'll post a link if you're interested.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: BeAStooge on February 12, 2015, 10:13:25 AM
Tommy "Butch" Bond


Footnote... in the above picture, his character was simply 'Tommy.'

Bond left the series in late 1934, and when he returned for early 1937's GLOVE TAPS he was recast as 'Butch.'  The only one of the kids to play two different characters, each time as a series regular.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 12, 2015, 12:52:02 PM
I forget to add something, S-I-A - - in that reunion on "You Asked For It," the "Gang" were also reunited with their former tutor and with their director, Robert McGowan.

Overall, it was a good idea but with two problems. One was that host Art Baker seemed to be armed with one quip per boy, and the quips weren't good.  Also, there just wasn't enough time for this segment.  As an aside, Joe Cobb looks strange, not at all like himself as man nor boy. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 12, 2015, 02:58:29 PM

Footnote... in the above picture, his character was simply 'Tommy.'

Bond left the series in late 1934, and when he returned for early 1937's GLOVE TAPS he was recast as 'Butch.'  The only one of the kids to play two different characters, each time as a series regular.
Yeah, I knew that. &, BTW, 1934 was also an important yet for a certain slapping trio..
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on February 13, 2015, 09:44:06 AM
I'm glad someone started this thread. I think the Rascals are just as good and funny as the Stooges. Dorothy is my favorite leading lady. So many good boy Rascals can't think of any one who's my favorite off the top of my head.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 13, 2015, 11:19:26 AM
'Twas Shemp-Is-Awesome78 who started this thread - - thanks, S-I-A!

I was hoping you'd show up here, Stoogerascalfan62.  I'm glad to see you.  I have trouble choosing *any* favorite character, as I said before.  Each one has something special.   Do you have a favorite short? 

Has anyone read Leonard Maltin's book(s) on Our Gang/Little Rascals?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 13, 2015, 03:41:23 PM
'Twas Shemp-Is-Awesome78 who started this thread - - thanks, S-I-A!

I was hoping you'd show up here, Stoogerascalfan62.  I'm glad to see you.  I have trouble choosing *any* favorite character, as I said before.  Each one has something special.   Do you have a favorite short? 

Has anyone read Leonard Maltin's book(s) on Our Gang/Little Rascals?
In fact, I'm just in the middle of reading that book right now! But, I'm only on the Pathe silents. I got it at the library.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 14, 2015, 08:41:30 PM
In fact, I'm just in the middle of reading that book right now! But, I'm only on the Pathe silents. I got it at the library.

I get a LOT of books from the library.

How do you like it?  What is the copyright year on the one you're reading?  I once read the first version (1977), but I'm now reading the latest one (1992).  There sure is a lot of information! 

I hope you're enjoying this book as much as I am.

On a different OG/LR subject - - remember "Washee Ironee," the talkie with Waldo, the rich boy, who plays football with the gang, then gets so dirty he needs to wash his clothes but ends up appearing in front of his mother and her friends wearing only a lampshade?  I saw that one not long ago.  When Waldo wears a lampshade, he really reminds me of the leg lamp in "A Christmas Story." 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 15, 2015, 07:26:26 PM
 About Washee Ironee.. It's funny that you mention " Waldo, the rich boy" well, especially because that's not Darwood " Waldo" Kaye, and that's Wally Albright. My memory may not serve right, except I don't think he's ever referred to as Waldo.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 15, 2015, 08:27:38 PM
About Washee Ironee.. It's funny that you mention " Waldo, the rich boy" well, especially because that's not Darwood " Waldo" Kaye, and that's Wally Albright. My memory may not serve right, except I don't think he's ever referred to as Waldo.

You're right that the actor is Wally Allbright.  But he's called Waldo at least once, and I think it was more than once.  The one time I'm sure of is when his mother says,  "Waldo, your B-flat in the obligato pianissimo needs more staccato."
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on February 16, 2015, 11:00:43 AM
Chubby.  Definitely Chubby.  Especially when he's in love with Miss Crabtree or singing Asleep In The Deep.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 16, 2015, 01:45:49 PM
Chubby.  Definitely Chubby.  Especially when he's in love with Miss Crabtree or singing Asleep In The Deep.
Chubby Chaney certainly is a " lost Rascal" that not much people tend to recognize.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 16, 2015, 02:58:53 PM
Chubby.  Definitely Chubby.  Especially when he's in love with Miss Crabtree or singing Asleep In The Deep.

It's very funny in "Love Business" when he's in love with Miss Crabtree and he smooches the big cut-out of Garbo's head at the cinema.  Later he comes calling on Miss Crabtree when she's boarding with Jack's family.  Jack and Chubby are rivals because they both have crushes on Miss Crabtree, and they try to edge one another out.  Chubby's great in that one, too.


Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on February 16, 2015, 03:11:32 PM
That's the one I'm talking about.  " Don't call me Norman, call me Chubbsy-Ubbsy."
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 16, 2015, 03:12:58 PM
That's the one I'm talking about.  " Don't call me Norman, call me Chubbsy-Ubbsy."

That's the one!  I love that, "Chubbsy-Ubbsy!"
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on February 16, 2015, 03:18:40 PM
IIRC, he sings Asleep in the Deep in the same one as the throbbing cake, right?  Big-time funny.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 16, 2015, 03:26:50 PM
IIRC, he sings Asleep in the Deep in the same one as the throbbing cake, right?  Big-time funny.

Chubby sings "Asleep In the Deep" in "Little Daddy."  The cake is in "Birthday Blues."  That cake still makes me laugh out loud.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: BeAStooge on February 16, 2015, 05:02:47 PM
The cake is in "Birthday Blues."  That cake still makes me laugh out loud.


One of Cliff Clavin's favorites too...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPB8f6pJgjw
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 19, 2015, 04:26:01 PM
Eh, there's nothing special about that Cheers clip... except for grown-up Spanky... sitting with a cast member from Cheers... in his last TV appearance before death. Okay, whatever, it is kinda special!!!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on February 20, 2015, 09:37:42 AM
My favorite part of "Love Business" is when Dorothy misquotes Chubby, thinking he said "I hear the fleas in your whiskers" [actual saying-"Can't you hear the pleas in my whispers?"] and "I just want to rip my pants" [Chubby-"I just want to skip and dance"].
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 20, 2015, 10:12:31 AM
Yes, Love Business is one of the better early sound Our Gang shorts. " Don't call me Norman, call me Chubsy-ubsy!" That is so classic. Norman "Chubby" Chaney was very talented. It's a shame he was gone by 18... and am I the only one that finds it hard to believe that he was 13 in Love Business?

EDIT: Norman was actually 17 in Love Business. There is some confusion about his birthdate ( is it 1914 or 1918) but 1918 was a bogus year Norman's mother created to have her son fit in the age group for Our Gang kids. In the 1920 census, Norman is listed as being 5 and a half, which makes his birthdate 1914, and means he died at the age of 22.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 20, 2015, 12:29:10 PM
What amazes me is that Norman was so small and young-looking for his age that his parents told people he was six when he was ten, and it was believable.  So he started in the OG/LR shorts at the age when the other children were retired.

Did anyone here know about the grave marker for Norman?  I read about it but not till after it was a done deal.  He and his mother, who died when Norman was a teenager, were without grave markers.  Someone started a fundraiser among OG/LR fans and made not only enough money for a marker for him but enough for one for his mother, too.  It's a nice story.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 20, 2015, 12:49:25 PM
Oh, yeah, I knew about that nice, little story. And, have you seen this video? I didn't know kids knew about Our Gang, besides Spanky, Alfalfa, and Darla!!http://www.youtu.be/Jo9p6Psu2Ok (http://www.youtu.be/Jo9p6Psu2Ok)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 20, 2015, 01:43:04 PM
Every time I click on the video link I get an error message.  Can you tell me what to search for on youtube?  I can find it that way.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 20, 2015, 04:44:19 PM
It's by the user normanchaney, an the video is called Colin.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 20, 2015, 07:19:36 PM
Thanks, S_I_A78. It's nice that the little boy in the video seemed to like Norman.

Those are beautiful headstones.  I was picturing something smaller such as is on Alfalfa's grave. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 20, 2015, 07:31:58 PM
Yeah. I just watched the doc The Our Gang Story. It's pretty good, because it goes into detail about what happened after each of the cast member's careers, and shows clips if they were in any movies. I recommend it.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 20, 2015, 07:48:02 PM
Yeah. I just watched the doc The Our Gang Story. It's pretty good, because it goes into detail about what happened after each of the cast member's careers, and shows clips if they were in any movies. I recommend it.

Is that on youtube?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 20, 2015, 08:07:33 PM
I don't know.. I watched it on DVD, except right now I'll go and look for it and see if it's on YouTube.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 20, 2015, 09:53:38 PM
I was thinking about "Chubbsy-Ubbsy" because of this discussion thread.  There was a catchy little song called, "Norman," from 1961; it was done by a girl called Sue Thompson.  There used to be a posting of it on youtube with a montage of still photos of Norman Chaney for the video portion.  But it's gone now.  I was going to post the link.  It was very nice, and the information section included some of his biography.

Are you familiar with Eugene "Pineapple" Jackson?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 20, 2015, 09:55:06 PM

One of Cliff Clavin's favorites too...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPB8f6pJgjw

Thanks, BAS.  I forgot all about that cameo appearance.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 21, 2015, 07:04:40 AM
I was thinking about "Chubbsy-Ubbsy" because of this discussion thread.  There was a catchy little song called, "Norman," from 1961; it was done by a girl called Sue Thompson.  There used to be a posting of it on youtube with a montage of still photos of Norman Chaney for the video portion.  But it's gone now.  I was going to post the link.  It was very nice, and the information section included some of his biography.

Are you familiar with Eugene "Pineapple" Jackson?
I'm not as familiar with the silents, but I know Eugene Jackson. He was a nice child actor. Usually, when I tell people about the 5 main black stars of Our Gang, here's what happens:

Me: Do you know Sunshine Sammy Morrison?
Person: Yep, first black star.
Me: Do you know Allen Farina Hoskins?
Person: I always enjoyed him..
Me: Do you know Stymie Beard?
Person: Yeah, he was real cute.
Me: Do you know Buckwheat?
Person: Who doesn't?
Me: How about Eugene " Pineapple" Jackson?
Person: WHO??!!??

Yeah, I don't think many casual Our Gang fans know about Pineapple.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on February 21, 2015, 08:42:00 AM
Are you familiar with Eugene "Pineapple" Jackson?

Here's his page from Jackie Lynn Taylor's 1970 book "The Turned-On Hollywood 7."
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 21, 2015, 10:21:34 AM
Thank you, S_I_A78 and HiramHorwitz for your replies.  It's nice to find others who recognize Pineapple.  So far, you're the first two who have!  Speaking of Sunshine Sammy, I just watched a Charley Chase movie where SS's sister, Dorothy, played a big role.  I believe she's still alive, too.

I'll look around for that book by Jackie Lynn Taylor, HH.  Thanks for posting the page!  I'm always on the lookout for books by the performers.  Do you recommend this one?

Currently I'm reading Eugene "Pineapple" Jackson, Pineapple's memoirs.  What an upbeat person he was!  I just started reading the book, but he already has an impressive resume` at a tender, young age. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 21, 2015, 11:42:11 AM
Yes, he was also in one of The Addams Family movies, if I can remember correctly.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on February 21, 2015, 12:50:05 PM
I'll look around for that book by Jackie Lynn Taylor, HH.  Thanks for posting the page!  I'm always on the lookout for books by the performers.  Do you recommend this one?

I don't know that I'd recommend it, unless you can get it for a pittance.  The used copies available on Amazon are typically in the $50-$100 range, and that's way too much for this light weight 75 page spiral bound publication.  The Leonard Maltin book is considerably meatier, more polished, and complete -- and it's usually available at a significantly lower price.

When the Taylor book came out (1970), it was the only thing available focusing on the Gang.  As a novelty, it's nice to have, and was certainly interesting enough to thumb through in the day.  But the focus of the biographies is out of balance and sketchy.  Obviously, Taylor wrote about those she could find easily, and tended to ignore those outside of her sphere.  One of the final pages of the book is called "Jackie's Ten Most Wanted,"  which was a request asking the reader for any information available to help her find ten specific "lost" gang members.  Believe it or not, Jackie's "wanted" list included Joe Cobb, Tommy Bupp, Mary Ann Jackson, Spanky McFarland, Dorothy DeBorba, and Jerry Tucker.  That gives you some idea of the level of research that went into the book.

Not that the book is junk -- it's definitely a unique oddity for the diehard Gang fan -- but it's not particularly enlightening or interesting, and it doesn't appear to be highly accurate.  One thing that I always questioned is the chapter about Buckwheat, which includes a picture of young William Thomas playing the role, but identifies the Buckwheat in the picture as being James Frazier, and then goes on to address Frazier's current life.  This is not too much different from the 1981 20/20 Buckwheat piece airing shortly after the death of William Thomas, in which a seemingly random gentleman was identified as being Buckwheat.  At the time, it was clear that 20/20 hadn't done their homework, as most Gang fans were fully aware that the gent on the screen was an imposter.  Eventually, 20/20 made a retraction, after William Thomas Jr (who was an up and coming actor at the time) came forth with evidence that his father had been the young actor highlighted in the 20/20 film clips, and that the person being interviewed was a fake.  Enough said.

 

       
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 21, 2015, 12:57:40 PM
Oh, yes, I saw a clip of the 20/20 episode. The reporter did not do her homework and referred to Spooky Hooky as " the one where you guys are in a haunted house" or something like that. Spanky McFarland actually told them that it was not Buckwheat and that it was an imposter, except the imposter still claimed to be Buckwheat. I could tell the reporter was embarrassed. I could tell that even Bill English, the imposter was embarrassed, too!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on February 21, 2015, 01:02:06 PM
Oh, yes, I saw a clip of the 20/20 episode. The reporter did not do her homework and referred to Spooky Hooky as " the one where you guys are in a haunted house" or something like that. Spanky McFarland actually told them that it was not Buckwheat and that it was an imposter, except the imposter still claimed to be Buckwheat. I could tell the reporter was embarrassed. I could tell that even Bill English, the imposter was embarrassed, too!

Great stuff!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 21, 2015, 02:10:55 PM
I found a copy of Jackie Lynn Taylor's book on abebooks.com for a "mere" $125  :o !  I tried to request it from interlibrary loan but the system is acting up today.  After reading your review of the book, HiramHorwitz, I'll not worry that I may not be able to read it.  At this point, I'm up to my eyebrows in books to read anyway.  The old saying is true about so many books and so little time. 

I didn't see any of the TV programs about OG/LR, but I read about the impostors.  I think some of the impostors are glory-seekers while a few others are, frankly, delusional, believing their own stories.  But there's also the point, made on the Rascals board, that local children in some cities and towns were hired when OG/LR made personal appearances.  I didn't have time to read the whole article, but I'll go back to look again.  But it seems that some of the impostors were people who appeared with (or possibly as) the Gang but one occasion only.  But there is no new thing under the sun, as Ecclesiastes says.  Look how many claims were made to be Anastasia, the (supposed) survivor of Tsar Nicolas' family, for but one example.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 21, 2015, 02:12:33 PM
Yes, he was also in one of The Addams Family movies, if I can remember correctly.

I just saw a photo of him from that movie.  I saw the movie, but didn't remember him (you'd think a bass player with one arm projecting from his chest would be memorable).  Luckily, his book is chockful of pictures, and that's one of them.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 21, 2015, 02:44:19 PM
I found a copy of Jackie Lynn Taylor's book on abebooks.com for a "mere" $125  :o !  I tried to request it from interlibrary loan but the system is acting up today.  After reading your review of the book, HiramHorwitz, I'll not worry that I may not be able to read it.  At this point, I'm up to my eyebrows in books to read anyway.  The old saying is true about so many books and so little time. 

I didn't see any of the TV programs about OG/LR, but I read about the impostors.  I think some of the impostors are glory-seekers while a few others are, frankly, delusional, believing their own stories.  But there's also the point, made on the Rascals board, that local children in some cities and towns were hired when OG/LR made personal appearances.  I didn't have time to read the whole article, but I'll go back to look again.  But it seems that some of the impostors were people who appeared with (or possibly as) the Gang but one occasion only.  But there is no new thing under the sun, as Ecclesiastes says.  Look how many claims were made to be Anastasia, the (supposed) survivor of Tsar Nicolas' family, for but one example.
Here's a funny video about one of the imposters named Bill English on 20/20 claiming to be Buckwheat!

http://www.youtu.be/XGq1kHwREnc (http://www.youtu.be/XGq1kHwREnc)

There's also this short little clip on the doc I mentioned earlier of " The Our Gang Band" appearing in a personal appearance tour... Yeah, I read about that on the Rascals board, too.. Somebody claimed to be Farina, too. Even worse, it was a girl!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 21, 2015, 02:44:43 PM
Oh, dang! The video didn't show up. It's called Buckwheat Hoax.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 21, 2015, 03:14:59 PM
Here's a funny video about one of the imposters named Bill English on 20/20 claiming to be Buckwheat!

http://www.youtu.be/XGq1kHwREnc (http://www.youtu.be/XGq1kHwREnc)

There's also this short little clip on the doc I mentioned earlier of " The Our Gang Band" appearing in a personal appearance tour... Yeah, I read about that on the Rascals board, too.. Somebody claimed to be Farina, too. Even worse, it was a girl!

Oops, someone didn't do her homework!  I'm sure that made it easier to point out her fraud.

I'll look for the Buckwheat Hoax.  Do you know if Buckwheat's son wrote a book about his father? 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 21, 2015, 03:19:30 PM
I wouldn't think so, except I'm not positive. One of the real tragedies of Our Gang was Froggy Laughlin. He was one of the only things that made the MGM shorts worth watching, except he didn't live too long...  :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on February 21, 2015, 03:50:43 PM
Do you know if Buckwheat's son wrote a book about his father?

Yes, the book is published by Bear Manor Media and is available unabridged in the hard back edition and abridged in the soft back edition.  I don't know the details of the unabridged version, but I've heard that the abridged version is only about 40 pages in length.  Amazon's reviews of the abridged version are mixed -- from very good to very bad.  The book is co-authored by David Menafee, who I seem to recall has a website or blog.  If I can find any additional information on the book (like the differences between the unabridged and abridged versions), I'll share it with you here.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: BeAStooge on February 21, 2015, 06:16:21 PM
Currently I'm reading Eugene "Pineapple" Jackson, Pineapple's memoirs.  What an upbeat person he was! 


Had the pleasure to meet him a few times, and agree, an upbeat person!  Pineapple was a joy on the 1996 Sons of the Desert Convention Cruise.  Always with his ukulele, and strumming for his shipmates.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 21, 2015, 07:42:44 PM
It's great to know that he was in person as he comes across in his book.  I'm guessing you collect autographs, so you must be pleased to have Pineapple's. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 21, 2015, 07:44:03 PM
Yes, the book is published by Bear Manor Media and is available unabridged in the hard back edition and abridged in the soft back edition.  I don't know the details of the unabridged version, but I've heard that the abridged version is only about 40 pages in length.  Amazon's reviews of the abridged version are mixed -- from very good to very bad.  The book is co-authored by David Menafee, who I seem to recall has a website or blog.  If I can find any additional information on the book (like the differences between the unabridged and abridged versions), I'll share it with you here.

Thank you, HH, for telling me about this.  I had a vague recollection of hearing there was such as book.  Thank you in advance if you find any information to share.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 21, 2015, 07:47:09 PM
I wouldn't think so, except I'm not positive. One of the real tragedies of Our Gang was Froggy Laughlin. He was one of the only things that made the MGM shorts worth watching, except he didn't live too long...  :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[

I'm afraid I know nothing about Froggy.  I recall that his voice unnerved me when I was a child watching the Gang on TV.  I once read a story that he phoned some little girl who was his age.  When he asked to speak with her, the parent who answered assumed he was a dirty old man, owing to his voice, and hung up.  Poor fellow.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 21, 2015, 09:55:06 PM
I'm afraid I know nothing about Froggy.  I recall that his voice unnerved me when I was a child watching the Gang on TV.  I once read a story that he phoned some little girl who was his age.  When he asked to speak with her, the parent who answered assumed he was a dirty old man, owing to his voice, and hung up.  Poor fellow.
Don't know if that story is true, because he used the voice as a trick voice. Froggy sadly died in a motor scooter accident at the age of 16.. He also had crossed eyes, & I don't know if that's why he crashed
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on February 22, 2015, 05:52:02 AM
Thank you in advance if you find any information to share.

I haven't been able to dig up details, but the hardbound edition of "Otay" contains 160 pages in contrast to the softbound edition that contains 100 pages.  Of the 100 pages in the softbound version, about half are photos and about half are text.  What I'd really like to know is if the additional 60 pages in the hardbound edition contain mainly additional text, mainly additional pictures, or an equal combination of both.  I'll keep digging and let you know if I find the answer.  Otay?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 22, 2015, 07:16:23 AM
I think the last 60 pages are probably a combination of text and pictures.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 22, 2015, 07:51:07 AM
Don't know if this would be a help to you, Signor Spumoni, except I found an audiobook of " Otay! The Billie Buckwheat Thomas Story" by Buckwheat's son on audible.com.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 22, 2015, 01:59:29 PM
Thanks, fellas, you've been wonderful!  If I could, I'd send each of you a nice, big cake that goes, "weeeep, WOW!" to thank you.  :)

I plan to request the book via interlibrary loan tomorrow when I can phone.  Too bad the online request page is down or I could have done it yesterday.  Anyway, both of you have been so helpful, and I appreciate it very much.

S_I_A78, I have no idea if that Froggy story I related is true.  It was presented as a true story.  I've been amazed to see how many "facts" I read years ago are now said to be just rumors, lies, or misconceptions.  It could be that some of them were just publicity stunts, too.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 22, 2015, 02:45:13 PM
The Froggy story was a publicity stunt, I bet..
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 22, 2015, 04:57:30 PM
The Froggy story was a publicity stunt, I bet..

I wouldn't be surprised.  It's silly, but what opened my eyes to publicity stunts was "I Love Lucy."  Ricky's agent used to set those up often, plus there's the one where Lucy and Ethel are women from Mars.

Alan Young, in his memoirs, tells about an impressive publicity stunt he saw at a nightclub in LA.  Can't remember which nightclub.  But it illustrated the lengths agents went to then, and probably still go to now.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 22, 2015, 05:28:47 PM
Ah, well, that's show biz! Have any of you seen Our Gang's The pinch Singer? It s so cute when Buckwhet & Porky are whispering in each other's ears!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on February 27, 2015, 09:38:17 AM
I can't get the video-thing says clip not found.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on February 27, 2015, 02:50:28 PM
I can't get the video-thing says clip not found.
Yeah, that seemed to happen for some weird reason..
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on February 27, 2015, 02:58:50 PM
Yeah, that seemed to happen for some weird reason..

Do you use the hyperlink icon when you post links?  If not, that might be it.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 08, 2015, 12:09:59 PM
Do you use the hyperlink icon when you post links?  If not, that might be it.
I think I do.. But, back on topic.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on March 09, 2015, 01:39:26 PM
Wasn't it Porky Lee who uttered "O-tay" first?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 03:49:11 PM
Wasn't it Porky Lee who uttered "O-tay" first?
Yes, it was. However, more people commonly attribute the phrase to Buckwheat Thomas because of Eddie Murphy's SNL sketches involving Buckwheat where he always said "O-tay" in the sketches. Porky and Buckwheat both had speech impediments, and, like their screen characters, they were best friends.
 Don't know if anybody heard this story yet: Dickie Moore and Stymie Beard were both best friends. One night, there was an Our Gang reunion and Dickie and Stymie were very happy to see each other ( tears rolling down each other's faces), and said, " We should catch up with each other more often!" However, in a matter of weeks, Stymie was dead. I think I recall Dickie telling the story on an interview.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 06:54:10 PM
 Also, do any of you know which Our Gang movies Buckwheat was featured in the most? ( I know that Feed 'Em and Weep is definitely one of them, though  ;))
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 07:14:27 PM
More and more as he got older, I'd guess.  I seem to remember him quite heavily featured in the MGMs, along with Porky, neither of whom , IIRC, had speech problems by then.  Let's remember that in the "Otay" period they were hardly more than toddlers.  I have, I must admit, seen very few of the MGMs, so I might be dreaming.  See if I'm awake.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 07:22:18 PM
More and more as he got older, I'd guess.  I seem to remember him quite heavily featured in the MGMs, along with Porky, neither of whom , IIRC, had speech problems by then.  Let's remember that in the "Otay" period they were hardly more than toddlers.  I have, I must admit, seen very few of the MGMs, so I might be dreaming.  See if I'm awake.
Hmm.. I'm going to have a celebration for what would've been Buckwheat's birthday on the 12th. However, I don't have the MGM's.. I do have a few of them ( about 10) on MGM, and it was mainly just Robert Blake, Spanky, and Alfalfa featured just dealing with their family problems or teaching lame life lessons.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 07:29:14 PM
And, a propos of nothing, even though it's heartwarming to know that Porky and Buckwheat were best friends, as were    ( I now know, thank you very much ) Dickie and Stymie,  It's kind of cool to know that Spanky and Alfalfa, or at least their families, or manager/families, whatever, were edgy with each other.  The two little kids had such onscreen magic that at this date it would be gooey and boring to know they had been kissy-kissy off camera.  Let's face it: when those two were onscreen at their peak, little else mattered, even Darla.  Sad that their later lives were kind of crappy, and of course in Mr Switzer's case, downright awful,  but I like the soap-opera quality of their peak years.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 07:33:25 PM
And, a propos of nothing, even though it's heartwarming to know that Porky and Buckwheat were best friends, as were    ( I now know, thank you very much ) Dickie and Stymie,  It's kind of cool to know that Spanky and Alfalfa, or at least their families, or manager/families, whatever, were edgy with each other.  The two little kids had such onscreen magic that at this date it would be gooey and boring to know they had been kissy-kissy off camera.  Let's face it: when those two were onscreen at their peak, little else mattered, even Darla.  Sad that their later lives were kind of crappy, and of course in Mr Switzer's case, downright awful,  but I like the soap-opera quality of their peak years.
Well, it wasn't so much Spanky and Alfalfa, it was their parents arguing who was the more important Rascal. But, who's counting? Want to know who had really crappy lives? Norman " Chubby Chaney" who died at 21 over crash dieting a bit too much and William " Froggy " Laughlin who died of a motor scooter accident at the age of 16.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 07:46:39 PM
I've posted this somewhere else, I forget where, but there is a still of the kids with Laurel and Hardy, and it's amazing to see - they were SO TINY! Not only next to king-size Oliver Hardy, but even to Stan Laurel.  One loses perspective when the shorts themselves have only children.  Even Alfalfa, who was relatively tall, is about the size of Stan's leg.  It doesn't look like trick photography, a la Brats, either.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 07:50:46 PM
Chubby and Froggy had short lives, for sure, and George Mac Farland's life was anything but glamorous once he left Hollywood,  but Carl Switzer's life was short AND awful.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 07:51:41 PM
I've posted this somewhere else, I forget where, but there is a still of the kids with Laurel and Hardy, and it's amazing to see - they were SO TINY! Not only next to king-size Oliver Hardy, but even to Stan Laurel.  One loses perspective when the shorts themselves have only children.  Even Alfalfa, who was relatively tall, is about the size of Stan's leg.  It doesn't look like trick photography, a la Brats, either.
Ooh, post a link if you are able to find the pic! It sounds interesting! What do you think about the MGM shorts? What I think of them is crap. They kind of sort of suck... Some of them even deal with divorce and teach terrible school lessons!!!!!! What would Hal Roach've said? " MGM,  [censored]!"
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 07:54:09 PM
Chubby and Froggy had short lives, for sure, and George Mac Farland's life was anything but glamorous once he left Hollywood,  but Carl Switzer's life was short AND awful.
Yep, Carl got shot to death at the age of 31 over 50 bucks. He pulled a knife out, and the other person shot him and killed him. They used to be friends. It was said to just be self-defense, except I feel like nobody should shoot somebody and kill them just out of self-defense. There was probably something else going on between Carl and the other guy. A terrible, terrible life. At least, he found a few acting jobs, although in most of them he was forced to sing awfully and then after explain that he only did that as a child.. I still like his appearance in It's A Wonderful Life, though.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 08:01:23 PM
I can't retrieve that still, being as I am terminally computer-impaired, but I'm sure somebody on here can.  It's a fairly famous picture.  Also, BTW, it's nice to see that George "Spanky" Mac Farland's final appearance was on a classy show like Cheers in a scene that got big laughs.  He went out on a high note.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 08:04:44 PM
I can't retrieve that still, being as I am terminally computer-impaired, but I'm sure somebody on here can.  It's a fairly famous picture.  Also, BTW, it's nice to see that George "Spanky" Mac Farland's final appearance was on a classy show like Cheers in a scene that got big laughs.  He went out on a high note.
Yes. It's quite funny. One of the characters thinks he's Spanky, and goes on and on and on about Our Gang/The Little Rascals, to which Spanky says that he isn't Spanky. One of the other characters asks, " Are you Spanky?" and Spanky nods. It's a shame that he ended at 64. Such a cute child actor. Same with Scotty Beckett. Now, that was a real sad ending, if you ask me.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 09, 2015, 08:07:28 PM
I've heard the story that Porky and Buckwheat had speech impediments, but I don't believe it.  I'm the firstborn in my family, and I heard a lot of "baby speech" growing up.  Also, my mother decided I ought to look after her friends' sons from time to time when I was a teenager.  I've been around a lot of young children as Sunday School teacher and reading tutor, etc.  In my opinion, Porky and Buckwheat just had "baby speech."  I knew a seven year-old who still talked like Elmer Fudd, by which I mean to say that children's speech can mature at different rates.  Also, I think Porky and Buckwheat were even cuter because of the way they talked.  I seem to hear Porky, when he was at his youngest, pronouncing Spanky as "Banky," which is the way many young children would pronounce and "sp" sound.  I agree with the Big Chief that we need to remember just how young P. and B. were when they began. 

About friendships - - according to the Leonard Maltin's books, the children got along well, for the most part.  Some of the adult Rascals recalled Alfalfa's father encouraging him to be aggressive with the other children.  Yet Tommy Bonds remembered getting along famously with Alfalfa.  Another adult Rascal recalled that the children got along well but that the adults were more likely to jockey for position.  I'm still reading Mr. Maltin's book (as well as several others) right now.

There was an article, published last year, saying that the adult Alfalfa was set up and never had a weapon.

So, S_I_A78, how shall you celebrate Buckwheat's birthday?  I'd like to hear about that.  But I suggest that you not dress like Buckwheat, at least not in his youngest years when he wore that wacky shirt/dress thing and the long shoes with the pointy toes  ;) (those shoes were worn previously by Farina when he was small).   
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 08:10:12 PM
I've heard the story that Porky and Buckwheat had speech impediments, but I don't believe it.  I'm the firstborn in my family, and I heard a lot of "baby speech" growing up.  Also, my mother decided I ought to look after her friends' sons from time to time when I was a teenager.  I've been around a lot of young children as Sunday School teacher and reading tutor, etc.  In my opinion, Porky and Buckwheat just had "baby speech."  I knew a seven year-old who still talked like Elmer Fudd, by which I mean to say that children's speech can mature at different rates.  Also, I think Porky and Buckwheat were even cuter because of the way they talked.  I seem to hear Porky, when he was at his youngest, pronouncing Spanky as "Banky," which is the way many young children would pronounce and "sp" sound.  I agree with the Big Chief that we need to remember just how young P. and B. were when they began. 

About friendships - - according to the Leonard Maltin's books, the children got along well, for the most part.  Some of the adult Rascals recalled Alfalfa's father encouraging him to be aggressive with the other children.  Yet Tommy Bonds remembered getting along famously with Alfalfa.  Another adult Rascal recalled that the children got along well but that the adults were more likely to jockey for position.  I'm still reading Mr. Maltin's book (as well as several others) right now.

There was an article, published last year, saying that the adult Alfalfa was set up and never had a weapon.

So, S_I_A78, how shall you celebrate Buckwheat's birthday?  I'd like to hear about that.  But I suggest that you not dress like Buckwheat, at least not in his youngest years when he wore that wacky shirt/dress thing and the long shoes with the pointy toes  ;) (those shoes were worn previously by Farina when he was small).
I shall have a couple of people over, have a small Our Gang marathon ( of course, only episodes with Buckwheat.)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 08:10:25 PM
It's on YouTube.  Spanky's last appearance, I mean.  How old would Buckwheat be?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 09, 2015, 08:13:01 PM
I shall have a couple of people over, have a small Our Gang marathon ( of course, only episodes with Buckwheat.)

You know you must serve Buckwheat pancakes, don't you? :)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 09, 2015, 08:16:42 PM
It's on YouTube.  Spanky's last appearance, I mean.  How old would Buckwheat be?
84.
You know you must serve Buckwheat pancakes, don't you? :)
I'm not that extreme.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 09, 2015, 08:18:01 PM
I can't think of anything else made with Buckwheat.  But maybe there's a beer.  There's a beer made with almost anything, or so it seems at the grocery store.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 08:32:32 PM
Now you're talking.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 08:35:05 PM
Aha.  I googled it.  There's LOTS of buckwheat beer.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 09:04:34 PM
SIA, really? Only 84?  Born in '31?  How old was he when he made his debut, and I'm not asking this sarcastically, 3?  2?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on March 09, 2015, 09:27:51 PM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6RM1Gvw4Amo

Here's a clip of Spanky with Wheeler and Woolsey in KENTUCKY KERNELS (1934) in case anyone's interested.  Spanky must've been loaned out to RKO for this one.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0025345/
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 09:44:39 PM
As I said, I don't know how to post it, but the L&H/Spanky and Alfalfa still comes right up on Google.  It's so easy even I can do it.  L & H look like they're costumed for Way Out West.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on March 09, 2015, 09:58:53 PM
As I said, I don't know how to post it, but the L&H/Spanky and Alfalfa still comes right up on Google.  It's so easy even I can do it.  L & H look like they're costumed for Way Out West.

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/474x/35/8a/35/358a35e64ece3e3c9d389dbdbaa6bbb7.jpg)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 09, 2015, 10:14:11 PM
Aha.  I googled it.  There's LOTS of buckwheat beer.

Ha, that figures!  There's everything-else beer, so why not?  Have to wonder about the taste.  Sometimes I'm afraid beer is going through an Annie Greensprings phase.

Anyway, that's just the thing for your celebration, SIA78, pancakes and beer.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 10:14:42 PM
Thanks, Metal.  I think you've done this for me before.  If I had an ounce of initiative I'd learn the thing.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 09, 2015, 10:15:56 PM
SIA, really? Only 84?  Born in '31?  How old was he when he made his debut, and I'm not asking this sarcastically, 3?  2?

I think he was 3, a young-looking 3.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 09, 2015, 10:16:51 PM
Thanks for posting the photo, Metal.  That's a nice one.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 09, 2015, 10:22:58 PM
I think I might also have seen buckwheat served as a sidedish, like rice or couscous.  Pancakes, sidedish, and beer.  Skip the first two, and you've got yourself a party.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 09, 2015, 10:27:02 PM
I think I might also have seen buckwheat served as a sidedish, like rice or couscous.  Pancakes, sidedish, and beer.  Skip the first two, and you've got yourself a party.

 :laugh:
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 10, 2015, 05:28:11 AM
SIA, really? Only 84?  Born in '31?  How old was he when he made his debut, and I'm not asking this sarcastically, 3?  2?
He was 3, and he was just about the cutest thing I've ever seen.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 11, 2015, 06:56:09 PM
He was 3, and he was just about the cutest thing I've ever seen.

He was a cutie.  Have you ever had a pet which you named Buckwheat?  I was just thinking of ways to use names of favorite performers.  Sometimes, I suppose, a child might be named after a performer.  But not in this case.  Then I thought maybe you had a pet by that name.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on March 11, 2015, 08:36:32 PM
He was a cutie.  Have you ever had a pet which you named Buckwheat?  I was just thinking of ways to use names of favorite performers.  Sometimes, I suppose, a child might be named after a performer.  But not in this case.  Then I thought maybe you had a pet by that name.

I used to have a cat named Oliver, after Oliver Hardy.  He was a foot chewing, q-tip destroying little psycho cat, I miss him.

For years as a kid, I thought I was named after Douglas Fairbanks, Sr.  I saw a poster when I was a child for THIEF OF BAGDAD, thought it was cool his name was Douglas, and my Dad jokingly tells me I was named after him.  I believed it for years, and kind of wish I was.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 11, 2015, 10:49:18 PM
I used to have a cat named Oliver, after Oliver Hardy.  He was a foot chewing, q-tip destroying little psycho cat, I miss him.

For years as a kid, I thought I was named after Douglas Fairbanks, Sr.  I saw a poster when I was a child for THIEF OF BAGDAD, thought it was cool his name was Douglas, and my Dad jokingly tells me I was named after him.  I believed it for years, and kind of wish I was.

Did your cat have a moustache which suggested that name?  In high school I considered naming my dog Julius, after Groucho, but it just didn't suit him.  He had no similarity to Groucho, I'm just a fan.

I like your story about your name, Metal.  DF Sr. would be a neat person to have been named after; I don't blame you for wishing it were true.   

I went to primary school with a little girl named Lana. It was a Roman Catholic school at a time when parents usually gave their children saints' names.  There's no St. Lana, so I assume she was named after Lana Turner, especially because she was blonde.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on March 12, 2015, 12:09:56 AM
Did your cat have a moustache which suggested that name?  In high school I considered naming my dog Julius, after Groucho, but it just didn't suit him.  He had no similarity to Groucho, I'm just a fan.

I like your story about your name, Metal.  DF Sr. would be a neat person to have been named after; I don't blame you for wishing it were true.   

I went to primary school with a little girl named Lana. It was a Roman Catholic school at a time when parents usually gave their children saints' names.  There's no St. Lana, so I assume she was named after Lana Turner, especially because she was blonde.

No similarity to Oliver Hardy, just liked the name and just like Oliver Hardy.

It's funny you mention the saint thing, because my grandfather was so Catholic, he made the Pope seem Protestant.  He attended mass everyday after he retired.  I'm not aware he named his kids after saints, and this is in the 50's!  I'll have to ask my Dad about that.  There's definitely no Saint Lana...or Buckwheat.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 12, 2015, 05:50:43 AM
 Well, today is Buckwheat's birthday!! I've assembled a list of Our Gang movies where Buckwheat has notable scenes or is featured prominently throughout the whole entire episode.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 12, 2015, 11:10:26 AM
No similarity to Oliver Hardy, just liked the name and just like Oliver Hardy.

It's funny you mention the saint thing, because my grandfather was so Catholic, he made the Pope seem Protestant.  He attended mass everyday after he retired.  I'm not aware he named his kids after saints, and this is in the 50's!  I'll have to ask my Dad about that.  There's definitely no Saint Lana...or Buckwheat.

I was unique among my RC schoolmates because my came from another country, one which wasn't well-known then, as well as because I wasn't RC.  The only schoolmates who weren't given saints' names were those whose middle names were saints' names to compensate for different first names.  Of course, people were also named for family members, but those family members had saints' names, so it was about the same thing.  It will be interesting to see if your dad recalls anything about that.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 12, 2015, 11:16:20 AM
Well, today is Buckwheat's birthday!! I've assembled a list of Our Gang movies where Buckwheat has notable scenes or is featured prominently throughout the whole entire episode.

Happy birthday, Buckwheat! 
I was thinking about your party today.  I hope you and your guests have a terrific time.  Whatever you do, don't serve spaghetti with Tabasco, horseradish, etc., the way the Rascals did in "Teacher's Beau."  :)  Buckwheat helped add "firepower" to the spaghetti in that one, as you know.  But cake and ice cream are always good.  I don't recall any Rascals mishaps with those.
Leave a post listing the shorts you'll show.
Have fun, and drink a toast to Buckwheat for all of us in Moronika.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 12, 2015, 05:42:00 PM
Happy birthday, Buckwheat! 
I was thinking about your party today.  I hope you and your guests have a terrific time.  Whatever you do, don't serve spaghetti with Tabasco, horseradish, etc., the way the Rascals did in "Teacher's Beau."  :)  Buckwheat helped add "firepower" to the spaghetti in that one, as you know.  But cake and ice cream are always good.  I don't recall any Rascals mishaps with those.
Leave a post listing the shorts you'll show.
Have fun, and drink a toast to Buckwheat for all of us in Moronika.
Well, unless you count The Rascals' cake incident in Birthday Blues and The Rascals eating ice cream in The Stolen Jools, no mishaps. And, believe it or not, I forgot to watch Teacher's Beau! Anyways, the party is over, and we watched the Rascals for about 3 hours straight. It was pretty awesome watching Buckwheat transition from a baby to a 4-year-old with speech problems to a best friend of Porky to becoming what we recognize him as today. However, I didn' t bother with the MGM films, so there was Roaches only!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 12, 2015, 06:36:52 PM
Well, unless you count The Rascals' cake incident in Birthday Blues and The Rascals eating ice cream in The Stolen Jools, no mishaps. And, believe it or not, I forgot to watch Teacher's Beau! Anyways, the party is over, and we watched the Rascals for about 3 hours straight. It was pretty awesome watching Buckwheat transition from a baby to a 4-year-old with speech problems to a best friend of Porky to becoming what we recognize him as today. However, I didn' t bother with the MGM films, so there was Roaches only!

It sounds like a great party.  The only thing missing?  Me!  :)   Next time invite all of us Stooges fans, too.   ;)  [kidding, of course]
I'm glad you had fun.  I'll bet you and all your guests will have that theme music ("The Good Ol' Days") stuck in your head for a week! 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 15, 2015, 11:38:03 AM
It sounds like a great party.  The only thing missing?  Me!  :)   Next time invite all of us Stooges fans, too.   ;)  [kidding, of course]
I'm glad you had fun.  I'll bet you and all your guests will have that theme music ("The Good Ol' Days") stuck in your head for a week!
Yes, The Good Ol' Days is extremely catchy and after 17 times, it can get a bit annoying! I'll also have the Marvin Hatley music stuck in my head! For some reason, the music in which the giant is capturing the kids in Mama's Little Pirate always stands out to me, even more when I've seen it like 7 times! But, yes, it was extremely fun, even though I had seen all the films, but.. I'll also probably be celebrating Dorothy Deborba and Wheezer Hutchins' upcoming birthdays. However, if I did know you guys personally, I certainly would've invited you all and we would've had the best of times. Someday, we should have a Stooges convention for about a week, and we could have 1 or 2 days dedicated to other comedy teams, but, that would be pretty cool to have a Stooges convention only open to Moronika users.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 15, 2015, 07:05:43 PM
Yes, The Good Ol' Days is extremely catchy and after 17 times, it can get a bit annoying! I'll also have the Marvin Hatley music stuck in my head! For some reason, the music in which the giant is capturing the kids in Mama's Little Pirate always stands out to me, even more when I've seen it like 7 times! But, yes, it was extremely fun, even though I had seen all the films, but.. I'll also probably be celebrating Dorothy Deborba and Wheezer Hutchins' upcoming birthdays. However, if I did know you guys personally, I certainly would've invited you all and we would've had the best of times. Someday, we should have a Stooges convention for about a week, and we could have 1 or 2 days dedicated to other comedy teams, but, that would be pretty cool to have a Stooges convention only open to Moronika users.

I hope you also celebrate Johnny Arthur's birthday on 20.May (born in 1883).  He played Mr. Hood in "Feed 'Em And Weep," which gave us the birthday song, 
"Happy birthday, Mr. Hood,
Happy birthday to you,
To make your birthday turn out good
I give this present to you!"
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 04:51:08 PM
I hope you also celebrate Johnny Arthur's birthday on 20.May (born in 1883).  He played Mr. Hood in "Feed 'Em And Weep," which gave us the birthday song, 
"Happy birthday, Mr. Hood,
Happy birthday to you,
To make your birthday turn out good
I give this present to you!"
Johnny Arthur also played Spanky's father in Anniversary Trouble, and in another short that I can't recall the name of as Mr. Hood, I believe. But, when Porky sings that song, he sings so cute!! Also, I notice that Metaldams said that some Rascals cry. True, but only about Farina because he had a natural talent for crying.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 04:58:59 PM
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-QYvE6b1YavU%2FVQbPX_KdOJI%2FAAAAAAABWnU%2FV_O2mqdZGUU%2Fs1600%2FOur%252BGang%252BLittle%252BRascals%252C%252Bca.%252B1950s.jpg&hash=82d461c6900d726da6f1d8fc43f8580ca845914f)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 05:15:01 PM
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-QYvE6b1YavU%2FVQbPX_KdOJI%2FAAAAAAABWnU%2FV_O2mqdZGUU%2Fs1600%2FOur%252BGang%252BLittle%252BRascals%252C%252Bca.%252B1950s.jpg&hash=82d461c6900d726da6f1d8fc43f8580ca845914f)
Yes, that is a pretty good picture. If I'll go ahead and be the one that will name the people in the picture from left to right: Robert " Wheezer " Hutchins, Mary Ann Jackson, Harry Spear ( used to think it was Jackie Cooper, except now I realize it's Spear), Allen "Farina" Hoskins, and ( the remarkably talented performer who was capable of taking pies to the face) Norman "Chubby" Chaney. ( See if you can guess which film I was referencing to in that remark about Norman.)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 16, 2015, 05:15:18 PM
The " Learn That Poem " kid cries buckets at the end of the one episode he stars in.  Frisky Friskington, Jumping Jumparoo, Hoppy Hopkinton, what is that kid actor's name?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 05:16:26 PM
The " Learn That Poem " kid cries buckets at the end of the one episode he stars in.  Frisky Friskington, Jumping Jumparoo, Hoppy Hopkinton, what is that kid actor's name?
I have no idea what episode you're talking about. A talkie? Are you talking about Readin' and Writin'?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 16, 2015, 05:23:56 PM
Definitely a talkie,  the kid plays hooky, tries to have fun by himself while his conscience ( in his own voice ) keeps repeating  " Learn That Poem ".  Somehow he decides to face the music and recites the poem while sobbing.  The class laughs its ass off at his misery.  He was a one-hit wonder as a rascal, and it was either his character name or his real (or stage) name that was Winky Willoughby or whatever it was.  Can you tell I haven't seen it in decades?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 05:25:58 PM
The " Learn That Poem " kid cries buckets at the end of the one episode he stars in.  Frisky Friskington, Jumping Jumparoo, Hoppy Hopkinton, what is that kid actor's name?

That's Breezy Brisbane you're thinking of.  I like your versions of his name.  :)  His real name was Kendall McComas. 
The short was, indeed, "Readin' And Writin'."
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 05:27:02 PM
BB was in seven additional Rascals shorts.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 16, 2015, 05:28:01 PM
And BTW you shock me by saying that it's not Jackie Cooper in that photo.  I've never heard of Harry Spears.  You might as well have told me that it's not Chubby on the right.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 05:31:34 PM
And BTW you shock me by saying that it's not Jackie Cooper in that photo.  I've never heard of Harry Spears.  You might as well have told me that it's not Chubby on the right.

Have to agree with the Big Chief - - looks like Jackie to me, too.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 16, 2015, 05:32:08 PM
DINGDINGDINGDING, that's the one, Signor.  Breezy Brisbane.  Thank you.  That episode is the only one he really had the lead in, isn't it?
     EDIT: ( one month later ) I've since looked at this on YouTube, and noticed that Breezy, though very convincing, does not shed real tears as he recites.  To cry with tears on command is an exceedingly difficult technical acting trick mastered by very few, Judy Garland and, apparently, Farina among those who could do it. Breezy ( or Hoppy, or Jumpy, or Spazzy, sorry I couldn't remember his name ) does a very good acting job here, lacking nothing but the legitimately teary eye.  As you may remember, I mistakenly remembered him crying buckets.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 05:35:15 PM
DINGDINGDINGDING, that's the one, Signor.  Breezy Brisbane.  Thank you.  That episode is the only one he really had the lead in, isn't it?

I believe that is the only one where he had the lead.  Before he made Rascals comedies, he was a member of the troupe who made the Mickey "Himself" McGuire comedy shorts (I think those were made by Columbia).
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 05:38:47 PM
Yes, that was Breezy Brisbane, indeed. Only, in some films., he's called Breezy, and in some he's called Brisbane, and Harry Spear was an actor from late-silent to early-talkies. He has been a lost player until like the 80's, because he didn't like admitting that he was in Our Gang, for some weird reason.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 16, 2015, 05:41:55 PM
Maybe the Curse.  Whatever, that's a great eye, SIA.   What made you see it wasn't Jackie Cooper?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 05:43:06 PM
Yes, that was Breezy Brisbane, indeed. Only, in some films., he's called Breezy, and in some he's called Brisbane, and Harry Spear was an actor from late-silent to early-talkies. He has been a lost player until like the 80's, because he didn't like admitting that he was in Our Gang, for some weird reason.

I've seen Harry in some of the silents.  Maybe he was pestered by fans and that's why he hated to admit he was in OG.  Maybe it took the focus off his adult life and accomplishments.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 05:45:40 PM
I've seen Harry in some of the silents.  Maybe he was pestered by fans and that's why he hated to admit he was in OG.  Maybe it took the focus off his adult life and accomplishments.
Yeah, maybe..
Maybe the Curse.  Whatever, that's a great eye, SIA.   What made you see it wasn't Jackie Cooper?
Well, normally, I associate Jackie with a bit of curls and blonde hair, while Harry does not have curls nor blonde hair, and he has a bit more makeup on than Jackie usually does. Plus, this was taken in early 1929, which means Jackie wasn't signed on yet.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 05:48:53 PM
Yeah, maybe..Well, normally, I associate Jackie with a bit of curls and blonde hair, while Harry does not have curls nor blonde hair, and he has a bit more makeup on than Jackie usually does. Plus, this was taken in early 1929, which means Jackie wasn't signed on yet.

Where do you see the year this was taken?

Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 05:49:45 PM
Where do you see the year this was taken?
I have seen this photo on various other sites, so I was just using the knowledge that I already knew about the photo.

So, did anybody guess the movie I was referencing to?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 05:52:57 PM
I have seen this photo on various other sites, so I was just using the knowledge that I already knew about the photo.

So, did anybody guess the movie I was referencing to?

Was it "Shivering Shakespeare?"

BTW, Jackie was in two Rascals shorts in 1929.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 16, 2015, 05:53:31 PM
Great eye.  No guess about the movie, sorry.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 05:55:26 PM
Was it "Shivering Shakespeare?"

BTW, Jackie was in two Rascals shorts in 1929.
Yes, you are correct, indeed. And, yes, I do know Jackie was in two 1929 shorts, except the photo was taken in EARLY 1929, from what I've heard and the two shorts Jackie were in were in LATE 1929. Also, does anybody always laugh hysterically during School's Out and during the schoolroom routine Miss Crabtree asks, " Who was the Hunchback of Notre Dame?" to which Jackie replies " Lon Chaney!" and Miss Crabtree gives an angry response.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 06:04:16 PM
Yes, you are correct, indeed. And, yes, I do know Jackie was in two 1929 shorts, except the photo was taken in EARLY 1929, from what I've heard and the two shorts Jackie were in were in LATE 1929. Also, does anybody always laugh hysterically during School's Out and during the schoolroom routine Miss Crabtree asks, " Who was the Hunchback of Notre Dame?" to which Jackie replies " Lon Chaney!" and Miss Crabtree gives an angry response.

I don't mean to argue about this subject of when Jackie joined the troupe.  But all I can find are the release dates for his three (I was wrong, three shorts, not two) shorts, not the filming dates.  They were released in late 1929, as you said.  But we don't know when they were filmed.  Some shorts would lie around for a long time before being released.

I do enjoy that line about Lon Chaney, yes.   :laugh:
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 06:06:33 PM
I don't mean to argue about this subject of when Jackie joined the troupe.  But all I can find are the release dates for his three (I was wrong, three shorts, not two) shorts, not the filming dates.  They were released in late 1929, as you said.  But we don't know when they were filmed.  Some shorts would lie around for a long time before being released.

I do enjoy that line about Lon Chaney, yes.   :laugh:
Yes, when I used to watch that film as a kid, that was the only line I could only get out of the school routine, except for the nonsensical ones. ( Surprisingly, I knew who Lon Chaney was, back then.) Also, it's a shame that more Rascals aren't alive. At least Jerry Tucker, Dickie Moore, and Robert Blake are alive ( well,not so much Robert... because he was whiny as crap.)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 06:21:48 PM
Yes, when I used to watch that film as a kid, that was the only line I could only get out of the school routine, except for the nonsensical ones. ( Surprisingly, I knew who Lon Chaney was, back then.) Also, it's a shame that more Rascals aren't alive. At least Jerry Tucker, Dickie Moore, and Robert Blake are alive ( well,not so much Robert... because he was whiny as crap.)

I, on the other hand, did not know who Lon Chaney when first I saw this short. 

I agree with you about Robert Blake's whininess.  Truth to tell, I've seen those shorts only a few times, and that was when I was young.  I don't like them enough to see them again, although I think Buckwheat was good.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 16, 2015, 06:23:46 PM
Have a good evening, S_I_A78.  I'll be going now because it's time to eat.  I think we're having mush and milk again.   ;)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 06:25:14 PM
I, on the other hand, did not know who Lon Chaney when first I saw this short. 

I agree with you about Robert Blake's whininess.  Truth to tell, I've seen those shorts only a few times, and that was when I was young.  I don't like them enough to see them again, although I think Buckwheat was good.
Yep, I was just watching a couple of them from the set a few weeks ago, and I had to stop after 8 episodes. Alfalfa's taller than most of the adult actors, Spanky is hamming it up for the camera, Porky is as tall as Spanky, Janet is trying too hard to be Shirley Temple, Mickey is too darn whiny, everybody's gestures are too bad, while the only two good things I find in the set are Buckwheat and Froggy, because his trick voice always makes me fall into hysterics and his crossed eyes also make me laugh. It's a shame he was gone by 16. He could've done so much more comedic things.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 16, 2015, 06:25:53 PM
Have a good evening, S_I_A78.  I'll be going now because it's time to eat.  I think we're having mush and milk again.   ;)
Again?  :) ( Then, comes the reworking of " Mush and Milk".)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 17, 2015, 04:03:49 PM
 Here's a sort of kind of connection between The Three Stooges and Our Gang: Back in around the 60's, I'd say, or maybe 50's, Columbia was trying to capitalize on the success of Our Gang, so Jules White put a whole group of talentless kids with Emil Sitka and said, " Do some funny stuff that'll turn out to be the next Little Rascals!" But, it was a fail. A big fail. A disaster, let's just say that. Like Hal Roach's Curley and Who Killed Doc Robbin, it was horrible. The fact of even trying to update Our Gang never falls to be a horrible picture. Just look at The Little Rascals Save the Day! I mean, some moments are okay, but the rest of the film sucks. Same with the 90's movie.. Well, some scenes in that movie do derive a chuckle, but it's all too modern for my liking. Trying to put the Rascals into our modern world is not a good idea. Our Gang can't, and will never be duplicated.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 17, 2015, 07:32:51 PM
Here's a sort of kind of connection between The Three Stooges and Our Gang: Back in around the 60's, I'd say, or maybe 50's, Columbia was trying to capitalize on the success of Our Gang, so Jules White put a whole group of talentless kids with Emil Sitka and said, " Do some funny stuff that'll turn out to be the next Little Rascals!" But, it was a fail. A big fail. A disaster, let's just say that. Like Hal Roach's Curley and Who Killed Doc Robbin, it was horrible. The fact of even trying to update Our Gang never falls to be a horrible picture. Just look at The Little Rascals Save the Day! I mean, some moments are okay, but the rest of the film sucks. Same with the 90's movie.. Well, some scenes in that movie do derive a chuckle, but it's all too modern for my liking. Trying to put the Rascals into our modern world is not a good idea. Our Gang can't, and will never be duplicated.

One of the child actors in 1947's "Curley" went on to stardom in a sitcom several years later.  Do you know who it was?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 17, 2015, 08:00:20 PM
One of the child actors in 1947's "Curley" went on to stardom in a sitcom several years later.  Do you know who it was?
Larry Olsen? Honestly, I'm just guessing, because Larry Olsen and Renee Beard are the only cast members I know of.

Do you know Winston and Weston Doty? They were twins that were in a few early silents. They died on New Year's Eve during a flood in 1934. I believe they were around 20..
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 17, 2015, 08:16:05 PM
Larry Olsen? Honestly, I'm just guessing, because Larry Olsen and Renee Beard are the only cast members I know of.

Do you know Winston and Weston Doty? They were twins that were in a few early silents. They died on New Year's Eve during a flood in 1934. I believe they were around 20..

Answer:  Billy Gray, who became better known as Bud on "Father Knows Best."

The Doty twins:  yes, I read about them.  They phoned their mother to say they were on their way home from a party but they never made it.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 18, 2015, 05:45:22 AM
Answer:  Billy Gray, who became better known as Bud on "Father Knows Best."

The Doty twins:  yes, I read about them.  They phoned their mother to say they were on their way home from a party but they never made it.
( Oh, I don't know who Billy Grey is.) I never read that part. I didn't know about it until a couple weeks ago. That just proves The Curse even more. I'm starting to believe it. Basically, everybody got it except for a couple who are still living and Jackie Cooper.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 18, 2015, 09:03:03 PM
( Oh, I don't know who Billy Grey is.)
You're probably a lot younger than I. am, or else your family watched something other than "Father Knows Best."  Both would be good reasons not to know Billy Gray.


I never read that part. I didn't know about it until a couple weeks ago. That just proves The Curse even more. I'm starting to believe it. Basically, everybody got it except for a couple who are still living and Jackie Cooper.

I don't believe in curses.  What I believe is that actors have hard lives.  Many of them, especially from a certain era, died suddenly or never made old bones.  Vaudeville touring was a rough life, for example.  A lot of actors just up and died, and probably from conditions which are treatable nowadays.  Even today, treatable conditions cause early deaths, though, with diabetes being a classic example, and even now there is sudden adult death syndrome.  And let's not forget that drugs  were in Hollywood from the beginning, and alcohol abuse was common.
Lots of actors who filmed near bomb-testing sites developed cancer and died from it.  A surprising number of actors committed suicide, such as Phil Van Zandt.   And there's always just bad luck or the unexpected, such as the Doty boys or Jay R. Smith.
But lots of actors lived happy, long lives.  Many of those left acting and went into other lines of work, such as Joe Cobb and Eugene Jackson [correction:  Eugene Jackson didn't leave acting so much as he branched out into dancing and other forms of entertainment, mostly outside Hollywood].  I don't know the percentages of what caused the deaths of actors vs. everyday people.  That would be interesting.
There are many sad stories among Our Gang and among Hollywood and Broadway performers generally.  But I don't believe any curse was responsible for anything.  Lack of education made many lives tougher; child actors often received poor educations because their schoolwork was second to their acting.  It's hard to be a successful adult when you're washed up at age eight or ten and when your schooling is inferior, and when your parents are not very good at being parents.  I think those things had more to do with Rascals' unhappy lives than anything else.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on March 19, 2015, 05:32:57 AM
I don't believe in curses.  What I believe is that actors have hard lives.  Many of them, especially from a certain era, died suddenly or never made old bones.  Vaudeville touring was a rough life, fo example.  A lot of actors just up and died, and probably from conditions which are treatable nowadays.  Even today, treatable conditions cause early deaths, though, with diabetes being a classic example, and even now there is sudden adult death syndrome.  And let's not forget that drugs  were in Hollywood from the beginning, and alcohol abuse was common.
Lots of actors who filmed near bomb-testing sites developed cancer and died from it.  A surprising number of actors committed suicide, such as Phil Van Zandt.   And there's always just bad luck or the unexpected, such as the Doty boys or Jay R. Smith.
But lots of actors lived happy, long lives.  Many of those left acting and went into other lines of work, such as Joe Cobb and Eugene Jackson.  I don't know the percentages of what caused the deaths of actors vs. everyday people.  That would be interesting.
There are many sad stories among Our Gang and among Hollywood and Broadway performers generally.  But I don't believe any curse was responsible for anything.  Lack of education made many lives tougher; child actors often received poor educations because their schoolwork was second to their acting.  It's hard to be a successful adult when you're washed up at age eight or ten and when your schooling is inferior, and when your parents are not very good at being parents.  I think those things had more to do with Rascals' unhappy lives than anything else.
Nice treatise, Signor.  Regarding the Gang actors' often shortened lives, I've often wondered if being forced to work 80 hours a week from the time one is two has anything to do with it.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 19, 2015, 02:11:58 PM
Nice treatise, Signor.  Regarding the Gang actors' often shortened lives, I've often wondered if being forced to work 80 hours a week from the time one is two has anything to do with it.

Thank you.
Excellent point, HH, excellent point!  Surely putting in work weeks which would be too long for adults cannot have enhanced the health of children. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 19, 2015, 09:05:19 PM
Did this really happen?  I would have thought that such things would be addressed in the Jackie Coogan Law.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 19, 2015, 09:49:30 PM
Did this really happen?  I would have thought that such things would be addressed in the Jackie Coogan Law.

The Coogan Law addresses earnings but not working hours. The first, and flawed, version of Coogan's Law came into being in 1939.

I know there are now child labor laws which restrict the number of hours child performers work by age, but I don't know anything about those laws in the early part of the twentieth century. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 19, 2015, 09:56:47 PM
Well, I know the laws were fairly strict in the late '30's for kids like Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland, fairly being a flexible term not necessarily excluding amphetamine dosing, but I don't know anything about the late 20's - early 30's.  Eighty-hour workweeks would seem self-defeating for a troupe of child actors, it being unimaginable to get a decent performance out of a kid that severely sleep-deprived.  Garland and Rooney were at least teen-aged, not that that forgives anything, but dosing 8-year-olds, besides being diabolical, seems from a business standpoint counterproductive.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 22, 2015, 03:57:30 PM
Well, I know the laws were fairly strict in the late '30's for kids like Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland, fairly being a flexible term not necessarily excluding amphetamine dosing, but I don't know anything about the late 20's - early 30's.  Eighty-hour workweeks would seem self-defeating for a troupe of child actors, it being unimaginable to get a decent performance out of a kid that severely sleep-deprived.  Garland and Rooney were at least teen-aged, not that that forgives anything, but dosing 8-year-olds, besides being diabolical, seems from a business standpoint counterproductive.
Speaking of Mickey Rooney, does anybody else have a very strong disliking towards the Mickey McGuire shorts as well as the Baby Burlesks series? They are obviously rip-offs of Our Gang trying to capitalize on Our Gang's success. It doesn't seem very right. Also, does anybody else know if Shirley Temple and Mickey Rooney ACTUALLY tried out for Our Gang?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: BeAStooge on March 22, 2015, 04:24:09 PM
Ref., Mickey Rooney

After the "McGuire" series ended, and before Mickey arrived at MGM renamed Mickey Rooney, he made personal appearances at theaters around the country as 'Mickey McGuire.'  One of those appearances was at Cleveland OH's RKO Palace Theater on August 28, 1932.  On the bill with Mickey were Ted Healy & His Stooges.

August 28, 1932... the day Jerome 'Curly' Howard premiered in the act.  This was the act's next gig after Shemp quit on August 19 in NYC.  It's interesting that up until just 1 year ago, an eyewitness to that milestone was still alive.
 
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1342.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo780%2FBeAStooge%2F_%2520live%2520_%2520Aug%252028%25201932%2520Cleveland%2520OH%2520%25201_zpskw028ayp.jpg&hash=650f3c45edaf412ba730c455f724120c24cf8015)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Paul Pain on March 22, 2015, 05:55:15 PM
Ref., Mickey Rooney

After the "McGuire" series ended, and before Mickey arrived at MGM renamed Mickey Rooney, he made personal appearances at theaters around the country as 'Mickey McGuire.'  One of those appearances was at Cleveland OH's RKO Palace Theater on August 28, 1932.  On the bill with Mickey were Ted Healy & His Stooges.

August 28, 1932... the day Jerome 'Curly' Howard premiered in the act.  This was the act's next gig after Shemp quit on August 19 in NYC.  It's interesting that up until just 1 year ago, an eyewitness to that milestone was still alive.
 
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1342.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo780%2FBeAStooge%2F_%2520live%2520_%2520Aug%252028%25201932%2520Cleveland%2520OH%2520%25201_zpskw028ayp.jpg&hash=650f3c45edaf412ba730c455f724120c24cf8015)

61 years, to the day, before I was born!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 22, 2015, 07:30:17 PM
PaulPayne, born under a lucky star (61 years later!).  :)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 22, 2015, 07:44:21 PM
Speaking of Mickey Rooney, does anybody else have a very strong disliking towards the Mickey McGuire shorts as well as the Baby Burlesks series? They are obviously rip-offs of Our Gang trying to capitalize on Our Gang's success. It doesn't seem very right. Also, does anybody else know if Shirley Temple and Mickey Rooney ACTUALLY tried out for Our Gang?

I've seen only a couple of the Mickey "Himself" McGuire shorts.  I didn't care for them, but I would like to see a couple more before I really say good or bad.  I've not seen the Baby Burlesks, only heard about them.  Let's not forget that child stars were in existence before Our Gang, so lots of people wanted to duplicate the success or do something similar but a little different.  The Toonerville series probably banked on having a ready-made following of Toonerville comics fans.  It must have seemed like a sure-fire idea.  The Baby Burlesks may have figured they could find children who were as cute as the existing stars, plus it was popular for children to do impressions of adults.  Baby Peggy brought down the Vaudeville house(s) with her impression of Ethel Barrymore, for example.  Hollywood - - and show business in general - - seldom hesitates to imitate success in the hopes of becoming successful.  When radio's "Green Hornet" became successful, lo and behold a new series appears, "The Blue Beetle."  And so on. 

I think Shirley Temple showed up at a cattle call for OG, but didn't get any further.  I really don't know about Mickey McGuire-turned-Rooney.   
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 22, 2015, 07:53:14 PM
Well, I know the laws were fairly strict in the late '30's for kids like Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland, fairly being a flexible term not necessarily excluding amphetamine dosing, but I don't know anything about the late 20's - early 30's.  Eighty-hour workweeks would seem self-defeating for a troupe of child actors, it being unimaginable to get a decent performance out of a kid that severely sleep-deprived.  Garland and Rooney were at least teen-aged, not that that forgives anything, but dosing 8-year-olds, besides being diabolical, seems from a business standpoint counterproductive.

Offhand I don't know the hours the OG/LR children worked.  I agree it seems self-defeating,  but I am also aware of the grueling hours children put in when in Vaudeville and in very early Hollywood.  But as I said, I don't know. 

I agree that dosing eight year-olds is diabolic.  Judy Garland's biographer wrote that her Judy's mother was the one who started her on pills when she was very young.  Diabolic indeed.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 22, 2015, 10:23:56 PM
Oddly, Aug 28, 1932 is 21 years to the day when I was born.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 22, 2015, 10:59:03 PM
Oddly, Aug 28, 1932 is 21 years to the day when I was born.

Another winner of this week's birthday contest!  :)

I read that in any group of eleven people, it is likely that two of them share a birthday. [That's not phrased well, but I hope it's clear.]  As many members of Moronika as there are, there ought to be more 28.August birthdays.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 22, 2015, 11:05:04 PM
Judy Garland's mother has taken a lot of heat, mainly from Judy, and maybe fairly enough, for being a stereotypical stage mother, but I don't really know that other than by tacit approval, that she was in the system of getting Judy speed.  From everything I've read, speed was available easily, but always from lower-echelon personnel like hairdressers, grips, make-up artists, etc.  I do not buy for a second the excuse that nobody thought it was dangerous.  If it was not dangerous, legitimate doctors would have been prescribing it in the wide open.  This was not how that system worked.  It was dangerous and shady and everybody knew it.  It's like the old-timers today who say about cigarettes  " nobody knew they were dangerous ".  Absolute, unmitigated horseshit, and all you have to do to prove it is watch a couple of stooge episodes wherein cigarettes are referred to as "coffin nails".  Coffin nails, for heaven's sake. This was a joke, yes, but a very small joke based on common everyday usage.  How much more evidence do you need?  Mark Twain referred to his chronic cough as "tobacco heart".  That was around 1901.  Anybody who buys into the picture of the olden days as innocent or scientifically uninformed is trying to fool himself.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on March 22, 2015, 11:11:26 PM
8/28/32 is 46 years, 3 months, and 26 days before before I was born.  Incredible that I share the same commonality as Big Chief and Paul....Curly joined The Three Stooges before we were all born!  Incredible! I think I'll have another glass of wine.  ;D
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on March 22, 2015, 11:31:47 PM
Metal, you young punk, that's a great idea, and I'll join you, though at the moment I'm swigging Sailor Jerry straight from the jug.  It is a pleasure swapping stooge theories and esoterica with you learned ladies and gentlemen, and I hope I don't come off as the Old Guy at the concert.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on March 23, 2015, 12:55:44 AM
Metal, you young punk, that's a great idea, and I'll join you, though at the moment I'm swigging Sailor Jerry straight from the jug.  It is a pleasure swapping stooge theories and esoterica with you learned ladies and gentlemen, and I hope I don't come off as the Old Guy at the concert.

Nah man, it's cool.  I've been on Stooge boards for 15 years, and there have always been all ages.  One of the cool things about this place.  Esoterica rocks, whether it's music or film.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Bum on March 23, 2015, 07:06:35 AM
It's like the old-timers today who say about cigarettes  " nobody knew they were dangerous ".  Absolute, unmitigated horseshit, and all you have to do to prove it is watch a couple of stooge episodes wherein cigarettes are referred to as "coffin nails".  Coffin nails, for heaven's sake. This was a joke, yes, but a very small joke based on common everyday usage.  How much more evidence do you need?  Mark Twain referred to his chronic cough as "tobacco heart".  That was around 1901.  Anybody who buys into the picture of the olden days as innocent or scientifically uninformed is trying to fool himself.

And on it continues; Over the last few decades, I've read countless testimonials from musicians/ actors/ athletes attempting to justify their cocaine use in the 1970's: "Well back then no one know that cocaine was addictive and dangerous".  As you so perfectly stated: Absolute unmitigated horseshit. I was a KID in the '70's and knew that cocaine was addictive and dangerous. And so did they.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 23, 2015, 05:59:20 PM
 Alright. Now, back on topic: I have a bit of some trivia for all of you. ( You can not use Google.) What year did Norman Chubby Chaney join the group, and was he in any silent shorts?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 23, 2015, 07:51:14 PM
Alright. Now, back on topic: I have a bit of some trivia for all of you. ( You can not use Google.) What year did Norman Chubby Chaney join the group, and was he in any silent shorts?

My guess:  1929, and yes.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 23, 2015, 08:12:45 PM
My guess:  1929, and yes.
You are correct in 1929, but you are not correct about yes. No, he was not in any silent shorts, because he joined during their second sound short and he was not in any of the silents, unless you count Boxing Gloves, which mixed sound footage with silent footage.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 23, 2015, 08:16:53 PM
You are correct in 1929, but you are not correct about yes. No, he was not in any silent shorts, because he joined during their second sound short and he was not in any of the silents, unless you count Boxing Gloves, which mixed sound footage with silent footage.

Glass half empty:  I'm half wrong.
Glass half full:  I'm half right. 
:)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 25, 2015, 05:43:05 AM
Glass half empty:  I'm half wrong.
Glass half full:  I'm half right. 
:)
Nice Stooge reference!! For some reason, that comment reminded me of Wheezer....... I have no idea why.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 29, 2015, 09:38:12 AM
 So, what does everybody think about the 90's Rascals movie and The Little Rascals Save the Day. In my personal opinion, I kind of liked the 90's one although it still didn't capture the essence of the original series.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 29, 2015, 10:56:02 AM
So, what does everybody think about the 90's Rascals movie and The Little Rascals Save the Day. In my personal opinion, I kind of liked the 90's one although it still didn't capture the essence of the original series.

Sorry, but I've not seen either one, by choice.  For me, it's the originals only.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 29, 2015, 11:40:12 AM
Sorry, but I've not seen either one, by choice.  For me, it's the originals only.
Yeah, I would at least recommend the 90's one. Although it's nothing compared to the originals, it's still a cute little flick. However, The Little Rascals Save the Day sucks crap.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on March 29, 2015, 09:09:16 PM
Yeah, I would at least recommend the 90's one. Although it's nothing compared to the originals, it's still a cute little flick.

I'll try to catch up with the '90s one, on your recommendation.

BTW, I saw your comment about no Rascals on TV.  A friend lives around Chicago and watches them on WCIU channel 26.4 on Saturdays.  I don't know if that channel is digital only or cable/satellite or what.  If this helps you, let me know and I'll get details.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on March 30, 2015, 06:24:38 AM
I'll try to catch up with the '90s one, on your recommendation.

BTW, I saw your comment about no Rascals on TV.  A friend lives around Chicago and watches them on WCIU channel 26.4 on Saturdays.  I don't know if that channel is digital only or cable/satellite or what.  If this helps you, let me know and I'll get details.
Oh, I don't get that channel. Occasionally, TCM plays the Rascals, however it's mostly MGM shorts or General Spanky.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on April 06, 2015, 01:31:00 PM
I wish a more popular channel would show the Roach-era talkies.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on April 12, 2015, 05:47:16 PM
I wish a more popular channel would show the Roach-era talkies.
Yeah, especially a channel geared towards kids.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on April 15, 2015, 07:17:10 PM
Yeah, especially a channel geared towards kids.

I agree with both of you.  I wonder why no one does.

SIA, do you plan to watch "Arbor Day" on Arbor day (24.April)?  I do.  I'm sure you love the part where Buckwheat forgets his line but is very pleased when his mother says it. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on April 16, 2015, 04:13:39 PM
I agree with both of you.  I wonder why no one does.

SIA, do you plan to watch "Arbor Day" on Arbor day (24.April)?  I do.  I'm sure you love the part where Buckwheat forgets his line but is very pleased when his mother says it.
Yes! The Arbor Day episode is actually the last two reel short the Gang made for Hal Roach. That short certainly is a classic, and I do enjoy the part that you mentioned.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on April 24, 2015, 09:32:02 AM
Wasn't Our Gang Follies Of 1938 the last 2-reeler the Gang did for Roach?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on April 27, 2015, 05:02:56 PM
Wasn't Our Gang Follies Of 1938 the last 2-reeler the Gang did for Roach?
Yes, and I also believe it was one of Hal Roach's last two-reelers, too!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: 7stooges on May 23, 2015, 02:55:26 PM
Favorite Our Gang short - that's a toughie. Each era of the series had at least one that really stood out. "Teacher's Pet" is a classic, a perfect blend of storytelling, comedy, memorable characters, and even a little bit of drama. Anything with toddler Spanky is great in my book. The Scotty Beckett years are especially delightful. The Spanky-Alfalfa years of the mid-late 30s are the ones people seem to find most recognizable (and marketable - I have yet to see any Wheezer Hutchins merchandise!). Yes, even the MGM era has a few (and I do mean "a few") gems.

I've been fortunate enough to see the majority of the silent shorts, and find them quite enjoyable. Though I did feel there was a minor void in the series after Mickey Daniels left. The addition of Jackie Cooper in the early sound era filled that hole. And Spanky McFarland filled it again after Cooper left.

As far as favorite Rascals go... that's not much easier to decide on. Each kid brought something special to the table. But I had to choose a favorite, I'd probably go with Stymie. As soon as he enters a scene you can't help but smile.

A few points/responses to the discussion:
- Leonard Maltin's book (by the way, co-author Dick Bann deserves A LOT of credit for the behind the scenes information featured) is definitely worth picking up. The only downside is that it hasn't been updated in over 20 years (about the same amount of time Our Gang ran in theaters!) A nice companion piece to the book is this very informative website put together by Bob DeMoss. It hasn't been updated in some time, but last I heard Mr. DeMoss is planning on putting his new findings into a book of his own.
http://theluckycorner.com

- Speaking of books, one on Alfalfa is currently in the works. I'm hoping it will show people just how much of a talent he was. I would recommend checking out one of the films Alfie (as his friends affectionately called him) made as an adult. He was a darn good character actor, and probably could have done bigger things if he had lived longer.

- As for Alfie's death, it is believed by many that no knife was ever pulled. Rather, Bud Stiltz (the man who shot Alfie) committed murder. Stiltz was the only one who made the knife claim; all other witnesses had no recollection of Alfie pulling any sort of a weapon. A knife was found near Alfie's body, but it  is believed that if fell out of his pocket. Whatever the case, the court ruled Stiltz acted in self-defense. Still quite sad.

- For the most part, the kids all got along fine. Spanky and Alfalfa were actually pretty chummy. On the other hand, their fathers loathed each other. You see, Spanky had been the series' biggest star before Alfalfa came along. Some form of jealousy was bound to show up - though rarely from the kids. I don't think many of them even knew that they were such big stars.

- The Our Gang impostors is a rather confusing topic. There were several Our Gang knock-offs produced during the silent era (Mickey McGuire, Hey Fellas!, Buster Brown, McDougall Alley Kids, Big Boy - the latter of which was produced by the White brothers). None of these series had a strong legacy. But because Our Gang still remains popular, it's easy for ex-child actors from these rival series to assume they were one of Roach's Rascals. One fellow, actor-producer 'Lucky' Brown, insists that he was an Our Ganger. But he has recollections of appearing in the shorts with Mickey Rooney. Conclusion: he was part of the McGuire gang.

Additionally, the Roach staff sent out a script to various small towns so that they could produce their own independent Our Gang film. This is where the female Farina came into play. A local city hired her to portray Farina in a fake Our Gang short. But how was she to know it was fake?

Bill English is a different case. From what I've heard, he actually had a mental illness that him believe he really was Buckwheat. Another sad story. He's since passed on.

Not sure what the story behind "The Our Gang Band" was.

- I've seen several of the McGuire comedies. If you're into surreal films that aren't especially funny (but somewhat memorable), check them out. The series was actually based on a popular comic strip (Toonerville Folks). The silent entries are the strangest - they rely heavily on cartoonish gags. The same sort of gags found in Larry Semon comedies (the late Semon was apparently a gag writer for McGuire). The talkies were clearly made on a lower budget. A few Rascals showed up in these shorts - Breezy Brisbane, Shirley Jean Rickert, and Donald Haines, among others. Chubby Chaney also reportedly appeared in  one shortly after leaving Our Gang.

- The Baby Burlesks, on the other hand, are pretty uncomfortable to watch. That's all I'll say.

- Jules White did try to copy Our Gang in 1954. 'The Mischief Makers' seemed to be a cross between an updated group of Rascals and an attempt at redoing White's earlier Big Boy comedies (little "High Pockets" seems to be modeled after Malcolm "Big Boy" Sebastion). Only one entry in this series ("Kids Will Be Kids") was produced. It's regarded by many as the worst short Columbia put out. But hey, Emil Sitka's in it!

- "The Our Gang Story" documentary is definitely worth seeing. You can find a copy on Amazon for practically nothing. It features quite a few nice clips, including one of the Rascals meeting Mussolini's son!

- I actually didn't think the 1994 Rascals movie was too bad. Flawed, definitely. It could have benefited from having the new set of Rascals playing themselves rather than already existing characters (then again, how do you sell a Rascals movie without Alfalfa or Buckwheat in it?) There were a few brief moments where the kids were allowed to be 'natural' (Buckwheat and Porky's scenes come to mind). Ex-Our Gangers like Tommy Bond and Eugene Jackson were reportedly upset about not being asked to be involved with the film, at least as consultants. Director Penelope Spheris was unaware that so many Rascals were still living at the time (I guess she never got her hands on Leonard Maltin's book). There had been some talk of getting Spanky McFarland for a cameo, but he passed on during pre-production stages. But overall, I feel the film recaptured the general essence of what the Gang was about - kids being kids - getting into mischief and having fun. Not a bad attempt, IMHO.

- I've seen "The Little Rascals Save the Day" once. I'm sure the filmmakers' hearts were in the right place, but one has to be cautious when reviving something like Our Gang. Overall, the kid actors seemed too professional. Most are fine actors, sure. But part of the original series' charm was that the kids were able to act naturally. On the plus side, it's the only Rascals reboot to feature Kennedy the Cop (though he's re-written as a semi-villain, for some reason)! If you're an Our Gang fan, it's worth seeing at least once. But I'm sure your kids will like it more than you.

- Other Rascals reboots included an animated Christmas special (featuring the voices of Stymie Beard and the late Darla Hood), a Saturday morning cartoon produced by Hanna-Barbera (and featuring such talents as Peter Cullen, Shavar Ross, and Patty Maloney), an off-Broadway musical (which featured such up-and-coming talents as Dule Hill and Jenna Von Oy), a TV pilot produced by Norman Lear (and featuring a young Gary Coleman as "Stymie"), and a series of commercials for Jell-O Gelatin Pops (featuring a young Seth Green as "Alfalfa").

- Besides "Curley" and "Who Killed Doc Robbin," Roach attempted to revive the Gang in 1955 to coincide with the series' move to television. A film was never made, but a series of Dell Comics were released. Speaking of comics, Walt Kelly produced a successful series of Our Gang comics for MGM during the 1940s. I'm not a big comic book person, but I quite enjoyed these. Two comic series were produced in the UK during the late-30s/early 40s - "Our Gang" and "Stymie and his Magical Wishbone" (yes, Stymie had his own comic series).

(And speaking of "Curley," did you know that star Larry Olsen is the older brother of Susan 'Cindy Brady' Olsen?)

- Projects that never got off the ground included a sequel to the 1990s Rascals movie, several new live action TV series (apparently, there was a series called "The New Our Gang" that actually did air briefly), a movie titled "The Big Rascals" (older versions of the Gang, I'm guessing), and "Crook's Incorporated." "Crook's" was written by Hal Roach in 1935 and was pitched to MGM as a possible Our Gang feature. Charley Chase, Thelma Todd, and Patsy Kelly were set to costar. A year later, Roach wound up starring the kids in a different feature - "General Spanky."

Guess there's not much more I can say except... "Gimme the high-sign!" (too bad there isn't an emoticon for that).
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on May 24, 2015, 06:02:04 PM
Wow, you really covered everything, 7stooges! Really informative. In fact, speaking of Dick Bann and Leonard Maltin's book, you could in fact write a book based off of all of that Our Gang knowledge!! You really covered everything!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: 7stooges on May 27, 2015, 02:11:23 PM
Some rare(ish) Our Gang clips:

Behind the scenes footage of Rainy Days (ca. late 1927):


Outtakes from some of the early talkies:


Newsreel footage of Pete the Pup and Harry Lucenay:


Little Rascals cartoon episodes:
http://www.dailymotion.com/us/relevance/universal/search/little+rascals+cartoon+abc/1

Jell-O Gelatin Pop ads (2 clips):




The Little Rascals Christmas Special:


Darla Hood on the Jack Benny Program (2 parts):




Our Gang: Inside the Clubhouse - Documentary (sadly, part 1 was blocked by a company that claims to own the rights to some of the clips used):
&index=1

"The Aurora Encounter," Spanky McFarland's last movie (skip to 32:40 and 34:48)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on May 29, 2015, 09:44:25 AM
I'd like to see a more books about the Gang/Rascals, especially with material not covered in the Maltin-Bann book. If there can be so many Stooges books, why not the Rascals?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on June 25, 2015, 10:25:21 PM
7Stooges, you have made two sizeable and informative contributions.  Thank you!  When I have the time, I'll comment a bit on some of the things you wrote.  For now, let me just say that it's a pleasure to "meet" you and I hope you'll post more here.  It's also a pleasure to find someone else who likes the silent Our Gang comedies. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Shemp_is_Awesome78 on June 26, 2015, 08:04:53 AM
 Yes, I would also like to thank 7stooges. I'll be sure to check out some of the clips that he mentioned!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Mark The Shark on July 11, 2015, 05:51:58 PM
Ref., Mickey Rooney

After the "McGuire" series ended, and before Mickey arrived at MGM renamed Mickey Rooney, he made personal appearances at theaters around the country as 'Mickey McGuire.'  One of those appearances was at Cleveland OH's RKO Palace Theater on August 28, 1932.  On the bill with Mickey were Ted Healy & His Stooges.

August 28, 1932... the day Jerome 'Curly' Howard premiered in the act.  This was the act's next gig after Shemp quit on August 19 in NYC.  It's interesting that up until just 1 year ago, an eyewitness to that milestone was still alive.
 
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1342.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo780%2FBeAStooge%2F_%2520live%2520_%2520Aug%252028%25201932%2520Cleveland%2520OH%2520%25201_zpskw028ayp.jpg&hash=650f3c45edaf412ba730c455f724120c24cf8015)

I know I'm late responding to this, but I want to thank Brent for posting this ad.

I just wonder though -- I know you know your stuff, and if you say "this happened at this location on this date" I would tend to believe you -- but I'm just curious how you nailed those dates down for Shemp's final appearance (until the 1940s) and Curly's debut. Then what of the supposed period where Fred Sanborn would have stepped in between the two?

And furthermore -- who are those three other names listed as Racketeers beneath Howard, Fine and Howard?

Also -- in his book One Fine Stooge, author Steve Cox mentions that Larry Fine's notes cite a one-off performance (on an unknown date, at an unknown venue, under an unknown group name) of Moe, Shemp and Curly (apparently without Larry and without Ted Healy). Has anyone ever found anything to substantiate this?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: BeAStooge on July 12, 2015, 08:46:38 AM
I'm just curious how you nailed those dates down for Shemp's final appearance (until the 1940s) and Curly's debut.

Thousands of documents (newspaper articles, theater ads, booking ads, performance reviews, playbills, etc.) comprise the live appearance database project at The Stoogeum.  A work-in-progress for 10+ years, their coming-&-going live appearance history from the 1910s to 1970s is archived.  August 20, both Variety and the NYTimes reported Shemp's quitting the night before.

And Bill Cassara's Nobody's Stooge: Ted Healy (http://www.threestooges.net/bibliography/index/Book) is available for this information.

Quote
Then what of the supposed period where Fred Sanborn would have stepped in between the two?

Sanborn did not step in between Shemp and Curly.   

Sanborn joined Healy's troupe in January 1929 for A NIGHT IN VENICE, as a replacement for a temporarily MIA Larry Fine.  When Larry was located and formally rejoined that Shubert show, Healy kept Sanborn on as a '4th stooge,' although he performed primarily as a single in VENICE with his xylophone act.  Sanborn remained with Healy for 1-1/2 years, thru 1930's SOUP TO NUTS.

Quote
And furthermore -- who are those three other names listed as Racketeers beneath Howard, Fine and Howard?

They're not Racketeers, or connected with Healy.  "Stevens, Nelson & Stevens" was a separate act on the bill.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Mark The Shark on July 16, 2015, 12:35:36 PM
Wow, thanks! It surprises me that at this stage of their career, a reviewer would make note of a change in Healy's Stooges/Racketeers/Southern Gentlemen/Gang personnel, especially just one of them. But I'm glad someone did, since that nails it down.

So where did that story of Sanborn "filling in" (as first mentioned in, IIRC, The Three Stooges Scrapbook) come from then? I also note that when he first steps on stage during Plane Nuts, Curly seems to be doing some of Sanborn's schtick. Next time he comes out, he's essentially Curly.

Who would have thought that at this late date, so many of these questions pertaining to relative minutae could be answered.

Now you've got me wanting to go searching for any kind of ad that might back up the Howard, Howard and Howard story.

I just looked at the ad again. So you're saying Shemp performed with the act one night, and BAM! Curly replaced him the next night? I would have thought there would have been some "down time," but given they were brothers, maybe Shemp stuck it out until everything was covered.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on September 07, 2015, 04:13:19 PM
Jean Darling, who appeared in silent Our Gang comedy shorts beginning in 1926, passed away on 4.September 2015.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on September 07, 2015, 05:16:46 PM
Jean Darling, who appeared in silent Our Gang comedy shorts beginning in 1926, passed away on 4.September 2015.

Yes, I did hear that.  She was about six weeks older than my grandmother, who passed in '07.  Makes me wonder if my grandparents were remotely like those kids.  May Ms. Darling rest in peace, I imagine there must be few cast members left.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: falsealarms on September 07, 2015, 11:22:35 PM
I imagine there must be few cast members left.

From Mark Evanier's News From Me blog --

"There are actually around 35 Our Gang performers still alive, though that number includes several who merely had bit parts in one or two of the shorts. I'm not sure which one had the most appearances…maybe Robert Blake (yes, that Robert Blake). He was in forty of the shorts. Most of those who are alive were in the sound Our Gang films which were made until 1944. Jean was one of the last four performers — all women — who appeared in the silent Our Gang shorts. And now there are three…"

http://www.newsfromme.com/2015/09/06/jean-darling-r-i-p/
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on September 09, 2015, 12:29:33 PM
Here's a six minute video of Jean Darling all grown up, preceded by a brief clip of her appearance in an Our Gang talkie, "Boxing Gloves."  She sings "Serenade To A Lemonade" here, quite a departure from her childhood appearances.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBbWgHTBHQk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBbWgHTBHQk)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on September 09, 2015, 02:05:21 PM
One last thing:  Here is a link to "The Butler's Tale," a silent comedy short made in 2013 and starring Jean Darling.  I include it as a curiosity.  One actor appears to have been influenced by Fin and another by Ollie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4Z_sFwSBb0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4Z_sFwSBb0)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on September 09, 2015, 03:10:44 PM
If I'm not mistaken, Rene Riva, the producer/director of this, is a regular contributor to the Laurel and Hardy Forum website.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on September 09, 2015, 04:10:17 PM
If I'm not mistaken, Rene Riva, the producer/director of this, is a regular contributor to the Laurel and Hardy Forum website.

Ah!  That would make sense.  It was clear that the person who made the video was a lover of the old films.  There was even a "cameo" by Ollie in the form of a photo on a book where an author's picture would appear. 

I need to visit Rene` Riva's Website.  I'm sure it's interesting.

Thanks, Big Chief.  :)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on September 09, 2015, 08:40:56 PM
As far as I know, it's not Rene Riva's website, it's just called the Laurel And Hardy Forum.  And it's a great website.  I think it's based in Great Britain, where L&H are practically national heroes.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on September 09, 2015, 09:33:17 PM
As far as I know, it's not Rene Riva's website, it's just called the Laurel And Hardy Forum.  And it's a great website.  I think it's based in Great Britain, where L&H are practically national heroes.

I apologize for my unclear writing, Big Chief.  Rene` Riva has a Website.  I saw a link on Youtube when I watched "The Butler's Tale."  That's the one I meant to visit, and I have done so.  Too bad for me I don't understand Dutch or I would be able to tell you what's on the site.

The L&H forum sounds intriguing.  I'll look it up and visit. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Big Chief Apumtagribonitz on September 09, 2015, 11:48:36 PM
I enjoy it a lot.  Very high-class clientele, and good fun.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on September 11, 2015, 09:37:31 AM
R.I.P. to both Jean Darling and Dickie Moore.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on September 11, 2015, 01:16:25 PM
Yes, may Jean and Dickie rest in peace.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on September 17, 2015, 01:02:06 PM
R.I.P. to both Jean Darling and Dickie Moore.

Speaking of Dickie Moore, SIA, have you read his autobiography?  I requested it from the library.  If you've read it, let me know what you think.  All others who have read are welcome to opine, too.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Tony Bensley on September 19, 2015, 01:37:35 AM
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-QYvE6b1YavU%2FVQbPX_KdOJI%2FAAAAAAABWnU%2FV_O2mqdZGUU%2Fs1600%2FOur%252BGang%252BLittle%252BRascals%252C%252Bca.%252B1950s.jpg&hash=82d461c6900d726da6f1d8fc43f8580ca845914f)
Yes, that is a pretty good picture. If I'll go ahead and be the one that will name the people in the picture from left to right: Robert " Wheezer " Hutchins, Mary Ann Jackson, Harry Spear ( used to think it was Jackie Cooper, except now I realize it's Spear), Allen "Farina" Hoskins, and ( the remarkably talented performer who was capable of taking pies to the face) Norman "Chubby" Chaney. ( See if you can guess which film I was referencing to in that remark about Norman.)
Hi Shemp_is_Awesome78!

Please kindly allow me to weigh in regarding the debate of the Jackie Cooper/Harry Spear identity.

You were right the first time, as that is most certainly Jackie Cooper, and NOT Harry Spear!

A Photo of Harry Spear can be found on his Bio Page at Dave Lord Heath's excellent Another Nice Mess Website, which includes the Hal Roach Stars and much more: http://www.lordheath.com/index.php?p=1_1160_Harry-Spear

Sorry about not directly uploading the photo, but I seem to have zero luck with the upload method used on this site!  It could be my choice of browser?  Who knows?

CHEERS!  :)

Tony

P.S. It's just a thought, but seeing the 'Our Gang' members in St. Patrick's Day type garb, I'd hazard a guess that this photo was taken in the early part of 1930.  This would account for Jackie Cooper being in the photo, as Harry Spear had indeed, departed from the Gang, by that time!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on September 20, 2015, 11:06:17 AM
Thank you for your opinion, Tony.  I agree with you; it looks like Jackie to me.  He had distinctive eyes, for one thing. 

I'll take your word it's 1930 here.  That would be make sense, seeing how much older and more mature Wheezer and Mary Ann look compared to when they debuted in the silents.  Certainly Farina is much taller here, too.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Tony Bensley on September 20, 2015, 11:30:39 AM
Thank you for your opinion, Tony.  I agree with you; it looks like Jackie to me.  He had distinctive eyes, for one thing. 

I'll take your word it's 1930 here.  That would be make sense, seeing how much older and more mature Wheezer and Mary Ann look compared to when they debuted in the silents.  Certainly Farina is much taller here, too.
Hi Signor Spumoni!

Why I site 1930, rather than 1931 as the likely year the photo was taken is, by that time, the five still present 'Our Gang' members appear noticeably older to me in the films that were released during the fall 1930 to spring 1931 cinematic season (At the end of which Jackie Cooper; Norm "Chubby Chaney" and Al "Farina" Hoskins departed!), especially in that season's 2nd half!

CHEERS! :)

Tony
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on October 30, 2015, 09:33:16 PM
Happy Halloween!
(https://threestooges.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F31.media.tumblr.com%2F6762a0a97486a47b84bd307493458560%2Ftumblr_mka9q4PvIg1rqm1vko1_500.gif&hash=611e35d2c99f9323b0abf34eef7dd07e8e418cf3)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on July 07, 2016, 03:17:30 PM
Hello, Little Rascals/Our Gang fans! Don't mean to comment on an old thread, but I just thought that I would mention that I am ShempIsAwesome just under a new nickname. I couldn't remember my password to the old account, so I had to create a new one. If anybody wants to talk Rascals with me, I'd be delighted!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on July 07, 2016, 07:24:36 PM
Hello, Little Rascals/Our Gang fans! Don't mean to comment on an old thread, but I just thought that I would mention that I am ShempIsAwesome just under a new nickname. I couldn't remember my password to the old account, so I had to create a new one. If anybody wants to talk Rascals with me, I'd be delighted!

Hey, CF!  I wondered what became of you.  It's nice to hear from you again.  Have you had any LR/OG parties lately?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on July 07, 2016, 07:50:48 PM
No, haven't had any... I got around to watching General Spanky, however. It was an alright feature. It was very interesting, considering the limited amount of kids that are in it. I heard that Jean Darling and Dickie Moore passed away, which made me very sad. I haven't seen much of Jean Darling but I have seen most of Dickie Moore's shorts. From what I've seen, they were very great child actors.

I am also a member of a Laurel and Hardy society, and I recently got an email that Jerry Tucker isn't doing so well, either. He is recovering from what I heard at the last meeting of the society, so that is very good news.

Also, I've been meaning to ask you this, Signor, but all the time away from the forum has prompted me to almost forget about the question. Anyways, what are your thoughts on the MGM Little Rascals shorts?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on July 07, 2016, 10:42:34 PM
No, haven't had any... I got around to watching General Spanky, however. It was an alright feature. It was very interesting, considering the limited amount of kids that are in it. I heard that Jean Darling and Dickie Moore passed away, which made me very sad. I haven't seen much of Jean Darling but I have seen most of Dickie Moore's shorts. From what I've seen, they were very great child actors.

I am also a member of a Laurel and Hardy society, and I recently got an email that Jerry Tucker isn't doing so well, either. He is recovering from what I heard at the last meeting of the society, so that is very good news.  Gosh, he'd have to be in his 90s.

Also, I've been meaning to ask you this, Signor, but all the time away from the forum has prompted me to almost forget about the question. Anyways, what are your thoughts on the MGM Little Rascals shorts?  Now that's a good topic.  I'll have to watch those again before I answer.  I can't even remember the last time I saw the MGM shorts.  It could have been when I was growing up.  I'll get back to you.  In the meantime, what do you think of the MGM shorts?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on July 07, 2016, 10:44:44 PM
7Stooges, are you still around?  I know StoogesRascals fan is still here.  What do you two think of the MGM shorts?  Everyone else is welcome to opine, too.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Paul Pain on July 08, 2016, 04:51:54 AM
I am also a member of a Laurel and Hardy society, and I recently got an email that Jerry Tucker isn't doing so well, either. He is recovering from what I heard at the last meeting of the society, so that is very good news.

I must know... what is the name of your tent?  :)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on July 08, 2016, 08:01:33 AM
I must know... what is the name of your tent?  :)
The Night Owls Tent.  :) It was one of the first.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on July 08, 2016, 08:05:35 AM
Replying to Signor, I don't really like the MGM shorts. Considering that there are so many fantastic Roaches' and so little MGM's, it's really not hard to compare the two. I remember that I bought a big set of them on my phone, and ended up only watching about 10 of them...

I remember there was one where Alfalfa dreamed of being a big football player, but his dad objected because Alfalfa had to pay more attention to schoolwork or something or other. It was really that bad. Of course, there are a few hidden MGM gems. I think that the public domain MGM short (Waldo's Last Stand) was really one of the best MGM's. It showed the kids being kids, rather than being forced to do stuff that MGM deemed necessary.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Tony Bensley on July 08, 2016, 12:16:09 PM
I ordered a used DVD-R set of the MGM 'Our Gang' shorts a couple years back.  They definitely aren't as good as the Hal Roach shorts, although there are a few gems in the first few theatrical seasons.  In my opinion, the post Spanky entries are the hardest to watch!

For anyone who might be interested, my short reviews of all 52 MGM one reelers are posted on Dave Lord Heath's "Another Nice Mess" website under "THE 52 OUR GANG MGM SHORTS" heading.  These may be coming down soon, as the webmaster is considering a change in format, which would include only the Hal Roach films.

http://www.lordheath.com/index.php?p=1_1722_Tony-Bensleys-Our-Gang-Shorts

CHEERS!  [pie]
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on July 08, 2016, 02:02:27 PM
I ordered a used DVD-R set of the MGM 'Our Gang' shorts a couple years back.  They definitely aren't as good as the Hal Roach shorts, although there are a few gems in the first few theatrical seasons.  In my opinion, the post Spanky entries are the hardest to watch!

For anyone who might be interested, my short reviews of all 52 MGM one reelers are posted on Dave Lord Heath's "Another Nice Mess" website under "THE 52 OUR GANG MGM SHORTS" heading.  These may be coming down soon, as the webmaster is considering a change in format, which would include only the Hal Roach films.

http://www.lordheath.com/index.php?p=1_1722_Tony-Bensleys-Our-Gang-Shorts

CHEERS!  [pie]


Why, Tony Bensley, I haven't seen you 'round these parts in donkey's years.  :)  It's nice to have your excellent contribution!  I'll head over to Lord Heath's for your reviews.

The short answer to your question, CF, regarding my opinion of the MGM shorts is that I recall disliking them.  But that's unfair, I believe, because it's been so long since I saw any of them, so I'd like to look them over before replying. 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on July 08, 2016, 03:22:18 PM
Why, Tony Bensley, I haven't seen you 'round these parts in donkey's years.  :)  It's nice to have your excellent contribution!  I'll head over to Lord Heath's for your reviews.

The short answer to your question, CF, regarding my opinion of the MGM shorts is that I recall disliking them.  But that's unfair, I believe, because it's been so long since I saw any of them, so I'd like to look them over before replying.
Ah. I would definitely recommend the first few seasons of them, as Tony Bensley did. Today, I watched a compilation video called Little Rascals Varieties. It had most of the "putting on a show" episodes. It had Our Gang Follies of 1935, Our Gang Follies of 1936, Reunion in Rhythm and Our Gang Follies of 1938.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Paul Pain on July 08, 2016, 05:39:53 PM
Quote from: metaldams
« Last Edit: Today at 03:42:37 PM by metaldams »

I wonder what that was about...
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on July 08, 2016, 05:42:34 PM
I wonder what that was about...

Signor's post was all in quotes, even the part he wrote.  I just, as a moderator, separated what he wrote from Tony.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on July 08, 2016, 07:39:33 PM
Signor's post was all in quotes, even the part he wrote.  I just, as a moderator, separated what he wrote from Tony.
I was wondering what that was all about, too. :) Thanks for clearing up the confusion.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Signor Spumoni on July 08, 2016, 08:49:41 PM
Signor's post was all in quotes, even the part he wrote.  I just, as a moderator, separated what he wrote from Tony.

Yikes!  ::) What a goof I made.  Thank you, Metal.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Tony Bensley on July 08, 2016, 08:56:23 PM
Yeah, thanks for separating Signor and I, Metal!  Felt like Siamese Twins for a bit, there!  ;)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on July 09, 2016, 08:02:21 AM
 Hey, SS. Did you ever get around to watching that documentary called The Our Gang Story? I forget if it's in YouTube, but you can find it for very cheap on Amazon. I got a "set" with The Our Gang Story, two compilation videos, and some silent and sound shorts for only about 5.00.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on July 11, 2016, 01:47:30 PM
I have a documentary on the OG/LR troupe myself. Wonder how many docs on the Gang have been done.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on July 11, 2016, 05:03:14 PM
I have a documentary on the OG/LR troupe myself. Wonder how many docs on the Gang have been done.
What documentary is it? I like gaining new knowledge on the Rascals and since books about them are so hard to find, usually the best resource for doing so are videos and documentaries.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on August 15, 2016, 01:43:06 PM
Regarding the MGMs, they were in the beginning well-intentioned, but are mostly as unwatchable as many of the Joe Stooges shorts.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Tony Bensley on August 15, 2016, 02:24:21 PM
Regarding the MGMs, they were in the beginning well-intentioned, but are mostly as unwatchable as many of the Joe Stooges shorts.
Viewing these in chronological order, I found the quality went downhill as more of the Hal Roach holdovers departed, and more inappropriately (For comedy!) themed stories were introduced, that fell into the public service and MGM "Crime Does Not Pay" series realm.  After George "Spanky" McFarland's late 1942 departure, the long running 'Our Gang' series was effectively finished, in my opinion!  It was at this time that the "fruits" of MGM's generally poor casting of new 'Our Gang' members became dreadfully obvious, with Billy "Buckwheat" Thomas the only remaining Hal Roach holdover, who was also hardly the Gang leader (Unlike Roach, MGM was very much a segregated Movie Studio!), as Spanky had been!

CHEERS!  [pie]
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on September 03, 2016, 10:03:12 AM
I have a documentary on the OG/LR troupe myself. Wonder how many docs on the Gang have been done.
It was "The Our Gang Story", probably done in the '90s, haven't seen it in some time. The Narrator was someone named Mike Eagan.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: mjkings on September 07, 2016, 01:59:01 AM
You can get all but 10 Our Gang silent on video. They are lost
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on September 08, 2016, 04:08:05 PM
You can get all but 10 Our Gang silent on video. They are lost
Where can you get them on video? Are they on Amazon or something?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: 7stooges on November 18, 2016, 10:01:54 PM
7Stooges, are you still around?  I know StoogesRascals fan is still here.  What do you two think of the MGM shorts?  Everyone else is welcome to opine, too.
Be prepared, lots to say here!

Well, I think that the main issue was that MGM didn't see the true value in 'Our Gang.' They saw some value - it was a popular, established name that could make the studio money. Gradually, MGM also began using that name as a way to shove public service announcements, patriotic messages, and mini Busby Berkely-style musicals down the throats of audiences.

The Our Gang kids are no longer the fun-loving mischief makers from the '20s and '30s. Now, they're mini-Andy Hardy's and would-be Shirley Temples, always trying to be good little American citizens who chastise other kids for doing the wrong thing. In DON'T LIE, for instance, Spanky scolds Buckwheat for lying. What is he, Buckwheat's mother? Buckwheat himself became little more than a one-note racial stereotype, getting the occasional "feets, do yo' stuff" style lines here and there. And if the kids did goof up, why, there would always be an overly-serious adult on hand to lecture them (and the audience) on good behavior.

Audiences were presented with instructional films on traffic safety, lessons on telling the truth, and Wartime information, such as the importance of rationing. Every third or fourth short seemed to be an MGM musical - especially after the War hit. Froggy's uncle (Walter Wills) would be on hand to coax the Gang into putting on over-the-top stage productions for the troops. The principal gangsters were usually overshadowed by a group of unnatural song-and-dance kids trained by choreographer Bud Murray.

I felt that the first season or so of MGM shorts was fine, for the most part. When Roach sold the Gang to Metro, he sent director Gordon Douglas and writer Hal Law and Anthony Mack (Robert McGowan's nephew) with them. Douglas was sadly let go after only the third short, ALADDIN'S LANTERN. He was replaced by George Sidney, who did a fine job - certainly for someone in his early 20s. His younger age may have given him a better rapport with the kids.

Sidney was replaced the following year by Edward Cahn, who was responsible for bringing Robert Blake into the cast. Cahn would later be succeeded by Herbert Glazer, Sam Baerwitz (who had previously directed Curly in ROAST-BEEF AND MOVIES), and others. By that point, finding a suitable director for 'Our Gang' became less about someone who worked well with kids and more about "who on the lot isn't busy?" None of these people were particularly experience in director kids - or comedy.

Hal Law and Anthony Mack were surprisingly kept with the series until the very end. While one could easily blame the quality of the scripts on them, keep in mind that they didn't have the final say - MGM did. Or rather, shorts division heads Jack Chertok and Richard Goldstone had the final say. One can assume that Chertok and Goldstone took the MGM formula and sort of forced Law and Mack to abide by it. I recently spoke with Anthony Mack's daughter, and she told me that her dad, unsurprisingly, really didn't like working at MGM. Towards the end of the series' run, one gets a sense that Law and Mack are crying, "we don't care anymore!" A perfect example is the last scene in FAMILY TROUBLES. Being that this was still technically a comedy series, it made sense to try to end each short on a joke. Here's what we got this time -
Froggy: All's well that ends well, I say.
Byron Shores: Froggy, Shakespeare said that.
Froggy: He did? Shucks!

There's no joke here.



The 'Our Gang' kids themselves (both the ones from the Roach and the ones MGM added) didn't seem to be enjoying themselves, for the most part. Some possible examples are Darla Hood and Janet Burston whenever they got a chance to sing, and Tommy "Butch" Bond. Being a freelance actor who worked at just about every major studio in Hollywood, Tommy seemed pretty accustomed to the 'studio system' and giving directors exactly what they wanted. He comes off as one of the stronger forces during this period.

Performances come off as unnatural, dialogue is often shouted, and musical numbers seem like the last thing any of these kids one to do (again, with the possible exception of Darla and Janet). As I said, the new directors chosen for the series may not have been the best fit for getting good performances from kids that weren't really trained in the professional sense.

MGM also had a habit of keeping the 'Our Gang' kids on past their prime, and failing to give them new costumes! You'll see Alfalfa and Buckwheat near puberty, and literally bursting out of their clothes.

In my opinion, The best MGMs are - in chronological order:
THE LITTLE RANGER
ALADDIN'S LANTERN
ALFALFA'S AUNT
DUEL PERSONALITIES
THE BIG PREMIERE
BUBBLING TROUBLES
GOIN' FISHIN'
KIDDIE KURE
COME BACK, MISS PIPPS
GOING TO PRESS
MIGHTY LAK A GOAT
DANCING ROMEO

The worst - again in chronological order -
TINY TROUBLES
TIME OUT FOR LESSONS
ALL ABOUT HASH
THE NEW PUPIL
GOOD BAD BOYS
YE OLDE MINSTRELS
1-2-3 GO!
DOIN' THEIR BIT
Most of the post-Spankys.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Curly Van Dyke on November 21, 2016, 01:38:51 PM
The Throbbing Cake-Those Bweep-Bwow!!! noises are hilarious. They used them a few more times in Our Gang.
I remember a scene when Spanky and Cotton emerge from a Lunch Counter with Huge Bellies and bump into
each other accompanied by a BWOW!!!!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: 7stooges on December 04, 2016, 08:38:18 PM
Long-lost 'Our Gang' film "The Old Wallop" is now on YouTube!



Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on January 20, 2017, 02:23:07 PM
Long-lost 'Our Gang' film "The Old Wallop" is now on YouTube!


No way! I haven't seen many of the silents but I am familiar with the cast and if I do recall there are a couple of their shorts that have been lost for quite a while and this must have been one of them. I'll probably end up checking out this short. What year is it from?
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: 7stooges on January 20, 2017, 09:57:52 PM
No way! I haven't seen many of the silents but I am familiar with the cast and if I do recall there are a couple of their shorts that have been lost for quite a while and this must have been one of them. I'll probably end up checking out this short. What year is it from?
1927.

As of now, only five of the silents are known to be completely lost - YALE VS. HARVARD, HEEBEE JEEBIES, EDISON, MARCONI & CO., GROWING PAINS, and THE HOLY TERROR.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on January 24, 2017, 07:35:27 PM
Yes. I have heard about these lost silent shorts from the Leonard Maltin book and the one that really stood out to me was Yale vs. Harvard being the concept of a football game and I would have been curious to see how the kids played the gags off. If this movie was around, it would probably be a football pre-game staple.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on April 24, 2017, 01:44:54 PM
There's a message saying that the video is private.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: stoogerascalfan62 on October 02, 2017, 01:48:10 PM
Sadly, Me-TV no longer shows The Rascals anymore. :(
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Tony Bensley on October 02, 2017, 05:41:18 PM
Be prepared, lots to say here!

Well, I think that the main issue was that MGM didn't see the true value in 'Our Gang.' They saw some value - it was a popular, established name that could make the studio money. Gradually, MGM also began using that name as a way to shove public service announcements, patriotic messages, and mini Busby Berkely-style musicals down the throats of audiences.

The Our Gang kids are no longer the fun-loving mischief makers from the '20s and '30s. Now, they're mini-Andy Hardy's and would-be Shirley Temples, always trying to be good little American citizens who chastise other kids for doing the wrong thing. In DON'T LIE, for instance, Spanky scolds Buckwheat for lying. What is he, Buckwheat's mother? Buckwheat himself became little more than a one-note racial stereotype, getting the occasional "feets, do yo' stuff" style lines here and there. And if the kids did goof up, why, there would always be an overly-serious adult on hand to lecture them (and the audience) on good behavior.

Audiences were presented with instructional films on traffic safety, lessons on telling the truth, and Wartime information, such as the importance of rationing. Every third or fourth short seemed to be an MGM musical - especially after the War hit. Froggy's uncle (Walter Wills) would be on hand to coax the Gang into putting on over-the-top stage productions for the troops. The principal gangsters were usually overshadowed by a group of unnatural song-and-dance kids trained by choreographer Bud Murray.

I felt that the first season or so of MGM shorts was fine, for the most part. When Roach sold the Gang to Metro, he sent director Gordon Douglas and writer Hal Law and Anthony Mack (Robert McGowan's nephew) with them. Douglas was sadly let go after only the third short, ALADDIN'S LANTERN. He was replaced by George Sidney, who did a fine job - certainly for someone in his early 20s. His younger age may have given him a better rapport with the kids.

Sidney was replaced the following year by Edward Cahn, who was responsible for bringing Robert Blake into the cast. Cahn would later be succeeded by Herbert Glazer, Sam Baerwitz (who had previously directed Curly in ROAST-BEEF AND MOVIES), and others. By that point, finding a suitable director for 'Our Gang' became less about someone who worked well with kids and more about "who on the lot isn't busy?" None of these people were particularly experience in director kids - or comedy.

Hal Law and Anthony Mack were surprisingly kept with the series until the very end. While one could easily blame the quality of the scripts on them, keep in mind that they didn't have the final say - MGM did. Or rather, shorts division heads Jack Chertok and Richard Goldstone had the final say. One can assume that Chertok and Goldstone took the MGM formula and sort of forced Law and Mack to abide by it. I recently spoke with Anthony Mack's daughter, and she told me that her dad, unsurprisingly, really didn't like working at MGM. Towards the end of the series' run, one gets a sense that Law and Mack are crying, "we don't care anymore!" A perfect example is the last scene in FAMILY TROUBLES. Being that this was still technically a comedy series, it made sense to try to end each short on a joke. Here's what we got this time -
Froggy: All's well that ends well, I say.
Byron Shores: Froggy, Shakespeare said that.
Froggy: He did? Shucks!

There's no joke here.



The 'Our Gang' kids themselves (both the ones from the Roach and the ones MGM added) didn't seem to be enjoying themselves, for the most part. Some possible examples are Darla Hood and Janet Burston whenever they got a chance to sing, and Tommy "Butch" Bond. Being a freelance actor who worked at just about every major studio in Hollywood, Tommy seemed pretty accustomed to the 'studio system' and giving directors exactly what they wanted. He comes off as one of the stronger forces during this period.

Performances come off as unnatural, dialogue is often shouted, and musical numbers seem like the last thing any of these kids one to do (again, with the possible exception of Darla and Janet). As I said, the new directors chosen for the series may not have been the best fit for getting good performances from kids that weren't really trained in the professional sense.

MGM also had a habit of keeping the 'Our Gang' kids on past their prime, and failing to give them new costumes! You'll see Alfalfa and Buckwheat near puberty, and literally bursting out of their clothes.

In my opinion, The best MGMs are - in chronological order:
THE LITTLE RANGER
ALADDIN'S LANTERN
ALFALFA'S AUNT
DUEL PERSONALITIES
THE BIG PREMIERE
BUBBLING TROUBLES
GOIN' FISHIN'
KIDDIE KURE
COME BACK, MISS PIPPS
GOING TO PRESS
MIGHTY LAK A GOAT
DANCING ROMEO

The worst - again in chronological order -
TINY TROUBLES
TIME OUT FOR LESSONS
ALL ABOUT HASH
THE NEW PUPIL
GOOD BAD BOYS
YE OLDE MINSTRELS
1-2-3 GO!
DOIN' THEIR BIT
Most of the post-Spankys.
In my opinion, the above is pretty much spot on.  Yes, the post Spanky shorts, save DANCING ROMEO (1944) (Which was ironically, the last 'Our Gang' short to be released!), leaned rather heavily towards being downright dreadful from BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, JR. (1943), onward.  Among these last MGM entries, Leonard Maltin has described LITTLE MISS PINKERTON (1943) as being just about a reel too long - In itself a rather scathing (But in my opinion, well deserved!) indictment for a one reeler!

For me, Janet Burston never displayed any real acting ability in the MGM 'Our Gang' series, although some others who have seen Janet perform in other films outside the 'Our Gang' realm, have indicated otherwise, one of whom took rather strong exception to my admittedly harsh opinion that she simply wasn't a very good actress!  Perhaps Janet might have fared better at the Hal Roach Studios, where keeping the performances natural as possible for their child actors was priority?  Who knows?

CHEERS!  :)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: CurlyFan1934 on November 05, 2017, 07:37:57 AM
I don't think that anybody has mentioned this in the thread yet, but I found out at a Sons of the Desert meeting about a year ago that Jerry Tucker passed away. I always thought that he was the best "snobby rich-kid" in The Little Rascals and he truly was able to bounce off of the other kid cast members and be a good villain.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: 7stooges on November 06, 2018, 09:12:41 AM
Some news from film preservationist Robin Cook:

Quote
Our DVD of YOUR OWN BACK YARD and THE LOVE BUG is now ready to pre-order for release on December 5th. 2018! The DVD also includes a two-minute clip of Hal Roach talking a little bit about YOUR OWN BACK YARD. The films have been digitally restored, and have musical scores by Ben Model. The Price is $12.50 + $6.00 airmail to the U.S.A. including postage and packing. For the United Kingdom, the price is £8.00 + £3.00 postage and packing. The rest of the world price is the same as the U.S.A. If you are paying via PayPal, you should select U.S. dollars for all countries except the United Kingdom when it should be in G.B. Pounds. The payment address for PayPal is rjc35@hotmail.com. If you would like to know more details, please e-mail me with the subject heading "YOBY DVD" at rjc35@hotmail.com--Or it may be better if you post any questions on this forum. I know I've said in the past that GIANTS Vs. YANKS will also be released, but that will be on the next release. I'll try to post pictures of the DVD and cover on this thread and also do a short video on YouTube showing part of the restored films.

Robin of C-W Films Restoration - Better Presentation releases.

DVD cover and sample screenshots are below.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: metaldams on November 06, 2018, 07:27:43 PM
Some news from film preservationist Robin Cook:

DVD cover and sample screenshots are below.


Thanks for the heads up.  Would be cool if a bigger set was released, but I also understand these restorations take time and money, not to mention a limited market, so I need to be thankful for what there is.

Based on what I have seen, I would say as a whole, at this point, I prefer silent Our Gang to talking,
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Marshall on July 20, 2019, 04:41:59 PM
Since the Moe Howard Mike Douglas Show appearances are on YouTube, does anyone here on the board recall Spanky McFarland and Darla Hood's appearance on Mike's program that same year? Spanky was a guest, and Darla was a surprise guest that Spanky didn't know was going to be on the show. I remember before he was introduced,, the show played the clip of  Spanky's "going bug huntin'" sequence from the 1933 "Spanky" Our Gang film. I've never seen that particular Mike Douglas Show since it's airing, and wondering if perhaps a copy was never saved of the program.

Marshall
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on July 21, 2019, 07:48:21 AM
Since the Moe Howard Mike Douglas Show appearances are on YouTube, does anyone here on the board recall Spanky McFarland and Darla Hood's appearance on Mike's program that same year? Spanky was a guest, and Darla was a surprise guest that Spanky didn't know was going to be on the show. I remember before he was introduced,, the show played the clip of  Spanky's "going bug huntin'" sequence from the 1933 "Spanky" Our Gang film. I've never seen that particular Mike Douglas Show since it's airing, and wondering if perhaps a copy was never saved of the program.

Marshall

I remember that Mike Douglas Show episode well, and have an audio recording of the show I made using my dad's reel-to-reel tape recorder.  Although I haven't listened to the recording in years, I know exactly where it is, and would be happy to digitize it and post an MP3 of it on this site, if you or others have any interest in listening to it.  As you probably recall, comedian Robert Klein was the co-host that week and performed his Our Gang parody which appeared on his Child of the Fifties record album.  And Darla sang (somewhat offkey, if memory serves me correctly), and of course, Spanky and Darla reminiced about their days making the Our Gang comedies.  IMDB identifies the air date of that particular Mike Douglas Show episode as November 8, 1973.  Here's the publicity shot highlighting Spanky and Darla's appearance with Mike that day.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Moose Malloy on July 21, 2019, 11:54:11 AM
Darla is unrecognizable in the Mike Douglas photo. I wonder what happened to her? Young adult photo below

https://alchetron.com/cdn/darla-hood-256f7955-8007-4b56-b087-4cb0033abaa-resize-750.jpeg

In the clip below, only 15 years or so before the Douglas show she was on The Jack Benny program with Groucho  (8:50)



Who is that lady in the second half of the skit? A tall, stern character actress in a jillion TV shows in the 60s/70s ???



Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on July 21, 2019, 04:49:49 PM
Darla is unrecognizable in the Mike Douglas photo. I wonder what happened to her?

Who is that lady in the second half of the skit? A tall, stern character actress in a jillion TV shows in the 60s/70s ???

My guess is that working full time starting at age 2 (likely supporting one or more parents and/or alternative family members) and then being a has-been most of one's adult life has a significant aging effect on any individual.

Although I'm not 100% sure which tall, stern character actress you're referring to, it's clear that Irene Tedrow is the female accompanying Jack Benny while being questioned by Groucho.   Tedrow's TV appearances spanned forty years, from 1949 to 1989.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Moose Malloy on July 21, 2019, 05:56:09 PM
My guess is that working full time starting at age 2 (likely supporting one or more parents and/or alternative family members) and then being a has-been most of one's adult life has a significant aging effect on any individual.

Although I'm not 100% sure which tall, stern character actress you're referring to, it's clear that Irene Tedrow is the female accompanying Jack Benny while being questioned by Groucho.   Tedrow's TV appearances spanned forty years, from 1949 to 1989.

Thanks. That's who I was referring to. The last I remember of her was on Andy Griffith as the town gossip that pissed off Aunt Bee all the time.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Marshall on July 21, 2019, 09:28:35 PM
I remember that Mike Douglas Show episode well, and have an audio recording of the show I made using my dad's reel-to-reel tape recorder.  Although I haven't listened to the recording in years, I know exactly where it is, and would be happy to digitize it and post an MP3 of it on this site, if you or others have any interest in listening to it.  As you probably recall, comedian Robert Klein was the co-host that week and performed his Our Gang parody which appeared on his Child of the Fifties record album.  And Darla sang (somewhat offkey, if memory serves me correctly), and of course, Spanky and Darla reminiced about their days making the Our Gang comedies.  IMDB identifies the air date of that particular Mike Douglas Show episode as November 8, 1973.  Here's the publicity shot highlighting Spanky and Darla's appearance with Mike that day.
hiramhorwitz, I would be grateful if you could digitize the recording and post an MP3 of it on this site. Thanks for posting the promo photo of Mike, Spanky, and Darla, too.  Funny, I remember the appearance of Spanky and Darla (first time they appeared together in 30 years), but have no recollection of Yoko Ono being on the program. And this is from a big Beatles fan.  BTW, I'd be curious to know who was the source of the Moe video from his Mike Douglas Show appearances. Before YouTube, I remember those videos were available in collector's circles. As I mentioned before, I've never seen any video available of The Mike Douglas Show with Spanky and Darla.

Marshall
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on July 22, 2019, 12:04:40 PM
hiramhorwitz, I would be grateful if you could digitize the recording and post an MP3 of it on this site. Thanks for posting the promo photo of Mike, Spanky, and Darla, too.  Funny, I remember the appearance of Spanky and Darla (first time they appeared together in 30 years), but have no recollection of Yoko Ono being on the program. And this is from a big Beatles fan.  BTW, I'd be curious to know who was the source of the Moe video from his Mike Douglas Show appearances. Before YouTube, I remember those videos were available in collector's circles. As I mentioned before, I've never seen any video available of The Mike Douglas Show with Spanky and Darla.

Here is a link for the audio recording of the show:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uvVWNzjB3KQxsglLQ428WOrBP4qwc7mC

Here are the time markings corresponding to a couple of the show's highlights:

17:23 to 35:50 minutes for the primary Spanky and Darla content; 39:20 to 43:15 minutes for Robert Klein's Our Gang parody; and 57:42 minutes to 1:03:00 hours for Yoko's musical performance.  Note that my tape deck started having problems as Yoko completed her song (was that a coincidence or just due to Yoko's tonal qualities?), and the problem reached a peak at about the 1:06 hour mark, when Spanky mentioned his upcoming appearance at the Walnut Street Theatre in Philly.  As it is very difficult to discern Spanky's words during this portion of the recording, I have attached a flyer for the Walnut Street Theatre appearance, which provides most of the important information about Spanky's show.

I believe that four out of five of Moe's 1973-1974 appearances on the Mike Douglas Show are readily available for viewing today because someone coughed up the rather high fee to have Group W Productions transfer the episodes from their one inch videotape originals to "current" formats.  Seems like the fee was around $1200 per episode, and that was about 20 years ago.  Unfortunately, the episode containing Moe's final appearance (the one with Jon Voight and Donny Osmond) was apparently lost, so as far as I know, that one is missing from the set.  The other four Moe episodes include:  1) Ted Knight as co-host; 2) Soupy Sales as co-host; 3) Roger Miller as co-host; and 4) Richard Lamparski (I can't remember if he was the co-host or just a single day guest).  Happily, I was lucky enough to attend the show featuring Moe and Soupy Sales, sitting in the audience next to Larry Fine's brother Morris and directly behind Moe's wife Helen.  What a day that was, getting the opportunity to hang out with Moe, Helen, and Morris for about 30 minutes following completion of the taping.  The good old days!

 

Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Marshall on July 22, 2019, 12:29:10 PM
Here is a link for the audio recording of the show:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uvVWNzjB3KQxsglLQ428WOrBP4qwc7mC

Here are the time markings corresponding to a couple of the show's highlights:

17:23 to 35:50 minutes for the primary Spanky and Darla content; 39:20 to 43:15 minutes for Robert Klein's Our Gang parody; and 57:42 minutes to 1:03:00 hours for Yoko's musical performance.  Note that my tape deck started having problems as Yoko completed her song (was that a coincidence or just due to Yoko's tonal qualities?), and the problem reached a peak at about the 1:06 hour mark, when Spanky mentioned his upcoming appearance at the Walnut Street Theatre in Philly.  As it is very difficult to discern Spanky's words during this portion of the recording, I have attached a flyer for the Walnut Street Theatre appearance, which provides most of the important information about Spanky's show.

I believe that four out of five of Moe's 1973-1974 appearances on the Mike Douglas Show are readily available for viewing today because someone coughed up the rather high fee to have Group W Productions transfer the episodes from their one inch videotape originals to "current" formats.  Seems like the fee was around $1200 per episode, and that was about 20 years ago.  Unfortunately, the episode containing Moe's final appearance (the one with Jon Voight and Donny Osmond) was apparently lost, so as far as I know, that one is missing from the set.  The other four Moe episodes include:  1) Ted Knight as co-host; 2) Soupy Sales as co-host; 3) Roger Miller as co-host; and 4) Richard Lamparski (I can't remember if he was the co-host or just a single day guest).  Happily, I was lucky enough to attend the show featuring Moe and Soupy Sales, sitting in the audience next to Larry Fine's brother Morris and directly behind Moe's wife Helen.  What a day that was, getting the opportunity to hang out with Moe, Helen, and Morris for about 30 minutes following completion of the taping.  The good old days!

hiramhorwitz,
Many thanks for posting the link for The Mike Douglas Show with Spanky McFarland, Darla Hood and more. I appreciate it so much. You were so fortunate to attend the show featuring Moe and Soupy Sales, and then getting to hang out with Moe, Helen, and Morris  after the taping. Wow!   Thanks, too, for the answering my question about the origin of the source for the Douglas shows with Moe that have been in collector's circles. Honestly, I don't remember Moe's appearance with Jon Voight and Donny Osmond on The Mike Douglas. I would have liked to have seen it.

Marshall
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on July 22, 2019, 01:44:47 PM
hiramhorwitz,
Many thanks for posting the link for The Mike Douglas Show with Spanky McFarland, Darla Hood and more.

Honestly, I don't remember Moe's appearance with Jon Voight and Donny Osmond on The Mike Douglas. I would have liked to have seen it.


No problem, Marshall.  Your interest in the audio prompted me to finally digitize my 46 year old reel-to-reel tape - something I should have done years ago!

As I recall, Moe's Voight/Osmond Mike Douglas Show episode didn't air on the Philly station for some reason, so I ended up viewing it on the NYC affiliate station, which was located sufficiently far away that the picture and audio were barely decipherable and constantly fading in and out.  Nonetheless, I caught the bulk of Moe's antics, where he played the role of a surgeon and extracted Donny Osmond from the chest of his horizontal patient.  At least, that's my recollection of what happened! 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: hiramhorwitz on July 22, 2019, 04:21:26 PM
One other thing you may be interested to hear - and that is that Spanky's wife Doris celebrated her 90th birthday this past weekend.  Time certainly does fly.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Marshall on July 23, 2019, 04:20:58 PM
One other thing you may be interested to hear - and that is that Spanky's wife Doris celebrated her 90th birthday this past weekend.  Time certainly does fly.

Thanks for this info too, hiramhorwitz.
Marshall
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Moose Malloy on July 24, 2019, 07:09:57 AM
If memory serves he was on for a whole week and I caught a couple of shows. I recall that he he had a full head of silver hair and he threw a pie in his wife's face. He was really spry for a geezer!
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Curly Van Dyke on December 05, 2019, 10:07:49 AM
Yes, that Cake noise is Classic. They used it again when Spanky got a shot of Tabasco sauce and when a Black Gentleman
was about to kiss his girl and met up with "Cotton the Monkey".
The Roach Rascals are So Good. Now and then Turner will fill a spot with an MGM Our Gang-Boy were they Bad! Even Spanky
and Alfafa couldn't save them. When they got down to Froggy and Mickey-forget it. Only Buckwheat hung on to the end.
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: 7stooges on October 22, 2020, 06:52:16 PM
Not sure how many have heard, but ClassicFlix is trying to get the Little Rascals shorts properly restored. Unfortunately, with only seven days of their crowdfunding left, they've only reached 41% of their goal. If I'm not mistaken, ClassicFlix has said they'll continue with the project (or at least with the first volume) even if they don't meet their goal - it's just going to take much, much longer to happen.

ClassicFlix also located "Los Cazadores de Osos" (the Spanish language version of "Bear Shooters"). They've even expressed interest in restoring the silent films. But that will depend heavily on how much funding they can get. Restoration is no easy task.

If anyone would care to donate, here's a link below:

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/little-rascals-preservation-restoration-project#/

(PS - I'm not affiliated with this project. I'm just trying to help support it)
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Samurai on December 20, 2023, 12:58:56 PM
Glass half empty:  I'm half wrong.
Glass half full:  I'm half right. 
:)
Nice Stooge reference!! For some reason, that comment reminded me of Wheezer....... I have no idea why.
Glass too big (George Carlin)
(slightly modified for context)

Apologies for dredging up the past, but I do what I must. Plus, stirring up a dusty hornet's nest on occasion leads to interesting conversation.

Last night, just before going to bed, I was following my typical weeknight routine. Watching the first 2 Stooges shorts on MeTV+ at midnight (they show 3 Stooge shorts, followed by 1 Our Gang, and ending with 1 Laurel & Hardy). Anyway, I was still awake when 'Love Business' came on. It has been years, if not decades, since I've seen this. Great memories of the early Miss Crabtree and Jackie shorts...not to mention Chubsy-Ubsy. Naturally, I came here looking to see if there was a Little Rascals thread. Dopey me, of course there was!

After scanning the entire thread, I felt compelled to share what many may already know, but some may not. Stymie was still doing a fair bit of acting well into the 70's. For me, the most memorable bits were from Sanford & Son. He was on 3 episodes, including one of my favorites (Fred Sanford, Legal Eagle...photo attached). 
Title: Re: Our Gang/The Little Rascals thread
Post by: Mark The Shark on December 21, 2023, 07:55:32 AM
For me, the best "Sanford And Son" episode with Stymie is "A Little Extra Security." One of my favorite episodes in the series.