Soitenly
Moronika
The community forum of ThreeStooges.net

One A.M. (1916) - Charlie Chaplin

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline metaldams



      ONE A.M. has always been one of my favorite Charlie Chaplin films.  Short number four out of twelve he made for Mutual Film Corporation - a period between 1916 - 1917 where Chaplin’s work was really maturing yet hints of his youth were still prevalent as he was only in his late twenties.  Really a good set of films to get acquainted with Chaplin.

      ONE A.M. does not always get the accolades some of the other Mutual shorts get because there are no mature or socially aware themes and quite frankly, is not all that easy to wax poetic about.  Why?  This is pure physical comedy we’re dealing with.  Brilliant physical comedy, but just physical comedy nonetheless, so people don’t fawn over this one the way they do THE IMMIGRANT or EASY STREET.  No class struggles, no historic portrayals of Ellis island, no pathos - ONE A.M. is simply the highest of peaks in portraying Chaplin as what he originally was when he started making films - an amazing physical comedian we can’t take our eyes off of.

      The plot of the film is quite simple.  Chaplin is drunk.  He gets gets out of a taxi in front of his house and tries to go to bed.  That is all the plot synopsis you need.  With the sole exception of taxi driver Albert Austin, sitting there hysterically wooden as he waits for Chaplin to pay his fare, Chaplin is the only actor in this film.  It’s all about the physical things he does in this simple premise of being drunk, the props he uses and the way the gags just build one after the other. 

      Getting out of a car is an ordeal, slamming the door with his arm draped over the window constantly as he tries to reach in his pockets to try to find pocket change.  Getting into the house is an ordeal.  Getting up those stairs is an ordeal, perhaps the funniest ordeal in the short.  Man does Chaplin milk this brilliantly - and the way he keeps falling down those stairs is incredible, not to mention the balance he has as he is preventing himself from falling on them.  Falling to the ground is an excuse to pour himself another drink, be afraid of the animal carpets on the ground and get dizzy on that spinning table.  The clock at the top of the stairs, the wall bed in the bedroom, all great props that Chaplin uses to their full potential.  However, Chaplin’s physical being is the greatest prop of all, just his movement and athleticism is such a sight to behold.

      ONE A.M. is a damn funny film.  All you have to do is watch Chaplin the whole time and appreciate his art at its most basic form.  Highly entertaining, watch this short in the link above and enjoy yourselves.
- Doug Sarnecky


Offline Paul Pain

  • Moronika's resident meteorologist
  • Moderator
  • Bunionhead
  • ******
  • The heartthrob of millions!
This was an astounding introduction to Charlie Chaplin for this here fan of classic comedy.  Man, do they know how to milk a gag for all it's worth without going overboard.  Out of several hundred moments, only two struck me as duds.  For 26 minutes, I am happy.

Everything is a tormenting ordeal, and it's nicely kept together by the recurring attempt to smoke the unlit cigarette and the drink from the decanter.
#1 fire kibitzer


Offline GreenCanaries

  • President of the Johnny Kascier Fan Club
  • Birdbrain
  • ****
Fittingly, it is about 1am here as I post this. In a way, this short kind of reminds me of TOWED IN A HOLE: only one brief appearance from a supporting actor (Albert Austin, Billy Gilbert) and the rest is the star(s) making the most out of one setpiece.

Some of my favorite parts were: Austin as the cab driver, who finally springs to life when Chaplin gives him the cigarette; Chaplin entering through the window only to find his key...; Chaplin finally solving the coat/table dilemma only to step on his coat and find himself in the same fix again; Chaplin failing to hang his coat on the rack and solving the problem by... putting his coat back on (and the little rug slide before then); Chaplin stumbling down the stairs backwards without falling; and the twists with the Murphy bed (upside down, the frame breaking). Lots of great stuff here.

I also kind of like how the pads on the stairs get exposed when Chaplin takes the carpet down with him. I did notice beforehand that they were quite squishy-looking.
"With oranges, it's much harder..."


Offline metaldams

Glad you guys enjoyed this one!  I’ll review another short soon.  Yes, I too noticed the padding on the stairs and it’s even obvious before it’s exposed.  Chaplin would injure himself without it, no doubt.  I’ll just reside myself that the the character drinks so much he had padding installed because this regularly happens.

One thing I forgot to add is he’s so drunk to climb the stairs yet he’s able to climb that pole to get to the upper floor.  Definitely adds to the humor.
- Doug Sarnecky


Offline Paul Pain

  • Moronika's resident meteorologist
  • Moderator
  • Bunionhead
  • ******
  • The heartthrob of millions!
There were so many fun things in this one.  Speaking of which...

When Charlie is walking on the table, pay attention to the pendulum on the clock.  It gives away what we already know to be an accelerated piece of film.  Camera effects are so important in these silent films and so underappreciated.
#1 fire kibitzer


Offline Dr. Mabuse

"One A.M." represents Charlie Chaplin's only solo vehicle — a one-man display of pantomimic virtuosity.  Chaplin’s expert turn as a bon vivant cannot be faulted, yet the claustrophobic setting and one-joke premise soon grows monotonous.

For all his comic gifts, Chaplin benefited enormously from his Mutual stock company and the talents of Eric Campbell, Edna Purviance and Albert Austin. Without this unique chemistry, Chaplin’s creativity as a performer and filmmaker was less effective. "One A.M." revealed that his presence alone could not sustain a two-reel comedy, as he soon realized:  "One more [film] like that and it's goodbye Charlie."


Offline metaldams

"One A.M." represents Charlie Chaplin's only solo vehicle — a one-man display of pantomimic virtuosity.  Chaplin’s expert turn as a bon vivant cannot be faulted, yet the claustrophobic setting and one-joke premise soon grows monotonous.

For all his comic gifts, Chaplin benefited enormously from his Mutual stock company and the talents of Eric Campbell, Edna Purviance, Albert Austin and Henry Bergman. Without this unique chemistry, Chaplin’s creativity as a performer and filmmaker was less effective. "One A.M." revealed that his presence alone could not sustain a two-reel comedy, as he soon realized:  "One more [film] like that and it's goodbye Charlie."

To each their own, but I can’t agree with this for the most part.  While true Chaplin’s Mutual cast regulars do add to the other films (and Albert Austin is good here in the beginning), Chaplin himself in my eyes more than carries this film with his virtuosic physicality.  It’s hypnotizing to me and an impressive performance.
- Doug Sarnecky


Offline Paul Pain

  • Moronika's resident meteorologist
  • Moderator
  • Bunionhead
  • ******
  • The heartthrob of millions!
I thought this was a decent vehicle.  Charlie really carries the material, though one could argue certain scenes are long.  But, I find it fresh and entertaining in an unique way, even for a one-man show.  This was like a one-man master class of pantomime.
#1 fire kibitzer


Offline Umbrella Sam

ONE A.M. is a good vehicle for Chaplin because it shows off his skills as a comedian arguably more than a lot of his other work. That’s not to say that it’s better or even funnier than his other works. However, whenever I think of Chaplin, I don’t usually think of his actual comedy skills as being as great as the other big comedians like Lloyd or Keaton. As the years went on, he placed more and more emphasis on the story and character motivations, and that’s not a bad thing. At the same time, though, it did feel like he was sacrificing a lot of comedy in order to make those moments work, while Keaton and Lloyd tended to find a good balance so their stories could be followed while also staying consistently funny throughout. Obviously, the focus was more on comedy at Keystone, but...well, it’s Keystone. While they definitely had great stunt work, their comedy could get pretty repetitive.

The point I’m trying to make is that ONE A.M. stands out so much because Chaplin’s comedy is in the forefront. In fact, it’s pretty much the only thing in the film with the exception of Albert Austin’s role at the beginning. Speaking of Austin, I absolutely love how he just keeps sitting there with his hand out while paying absolutely no attention to Chaplin’s struggle behind him. The rest of it is basically Chaplin drunkenly stumbling around his house. Normally, I’m not really a fan of comedies that revolve around drunks. They can have funny moments, but they can also get really tedious as well. Heck, some of Chaplin’s Keystone comedies are guilty of this (THE ROUNDERS being an example). However, ONE A.M. works for two reasons: the first is because it is just Chaplin by himself. He’s not ruining anyone’s day; he’s simply just trying to get to bed.

The other reason ONE A.M. works is because of Chaplin’s movement style. One of the most distinct things about Chaplin is the way he moves. It was very exaggerated compared to other comedians, almost like a cartoon character. Having him be drunk actually gives him an opportunity to play around more with his movements. The way he tries to walk up the stairs is just so outlandish that I can’t help but laugh, and of course there’s an even bigger payoff when he falls down, again in an exaggerated way. I especially love whenever he gets hit by the clock pendulum; that was definitely very well executed. I also really like when he keeps missing the glass when he tries to fill his drink. It’s a small moment, but the fast pace of it with Chaplin’s reactions makes it another stand out scene. The wall in the bedroom gags are great as well. Like the stairs gags, they’re milked a lot, but also like the stairs gags, there is a lot of variation in the various, distinct ways Chaplin can fall out of the bed, which is surprisingly more than I would have thought.

A great short overall, and probably a good one to show someone if you want to emphasize Chaplin’s comedy skills.

10 out of 10
“I’ll take a milkshake...with sour milk!” -Shemp (Punchy Cowpunchers, 1950)

My blog: https://talk-about-cinema.blogspot.com


Offline metaldams

ONE A.M. is a good vehicle for Chaplin because it shows off his skills as a comedian arguably more than a lot of his other work. That’s not to say that it’s better or even funnier than his other works. However, whenever I think of Chaplin, I don’t usually think of his actual comedy skills as being as great as the other big comedians like Lloyd or Keaton. As the years went on, he placed more and more emphasis on the story and character motivations, and that’s not a bad thing. At the same time, though, it did feel like he was sacrificing a lot of comedy in order to make those moments work, while Keaton and Lloyd tended to find a good balance so their stories could be followed while also staying consistently funny throughout. Obviously, the focus was more on comedy at Keystone, but...well, it’s Keystone. While they definitely had great stunt work, their comedy could get pretty repetitive.

The point I’m trying to make is that ONE A.M. stands out so much because Chaplin’s comedy is in the forefront. In fact, it’s pretty much the only thing in the film with the exception of Albert Austin’s role at the beginning. Speaking of Austin, I absolutely love how he just keeps sitting there with his hand out while paying absolutely no attention to Chaplin’s struggle behind him. The rest of it is basically Chaplin drunkenly stumbling around his house. Normally, I’m not really a fan of comedies that revolve around drunks. They can have funny moments, but they can also get really tedious as well. Heck, some of Chaplin’s Keystone comedies are guilty of this (THE ROUNDERS being an example). However, ONE A.M. works for two reasons: the first is because it is just Chaplin by himself. He’s not ruining anyone’s day; he’s simply just trying to get to bed.

The other reason ONE A.M. works is because of Chaplin’s movement style. One of the most distinct things about Chaplin is the way he moves. It was very exaggerated compared to other comedians, almost like a cartoon character. Having him be drunk actually gives him an opportunity to play around more with his movements. The way he tries to walk up the stairs is just so outlandish that I can’t help but laugh, and of course there’s an even bigger payoff when he falls down, again in an exaggerated way. I especially love whenever he gets hit by the clock pendulum; that was definitely very well executed. I also really like when he keeps missing the glass when he tries to fill his drink. It’s a small moment, but the fast pace of it with Chaplin’s reactions makes it another stand out scene. The wall in the bedroom gags are great as well. Like the stairs gags, they’re milked a lot, but also like the stairs gags, there is a lot of variation in the various, distinct ways Chaplin can fall out of the bed, which is surprisingly more than I would have thought.

A great short overall, and probably a good one to show someone if you want to emphasize Chaplin’s comedy skills.

10 out of 10

Great review.  The strict focus on comedy is the exact reason why I chose to review this one.
- Doug Sarnecky


Offline HomokHarcos

This was a great film, possibly my favorite Chaplin short (either this or Easy Street). It shows just how great Chaplin was, it was basically all him throughout.


Offline metaldams

This was a great film, possibly my favorite Chaplin short (either this or Easy Street). It shows just how great Chaplin was, it was basically all him throughout.

I’ll probably do EASY STEET after TRAMP TRAMP TRAMP.  Wanna get a W.C. Fields and Lloyd short or two in as well.
- Doug Sarnecky


Offline HomokHarcos

I’ll probably do EASY STEET after TRAMP TRAMP TRAMP.  Wanna get a W.C. Fields and Lloyd short or two in as well.
Sounds like a great schedule up ahead. I''ve probably seen them, so I will be able to give my thoughts.