0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.
Speaking of Laurel and Hardy, Rex Reed says the new movie (‘Stan & Ollie’ ) based on their careers is worth seeing:https://observer.com/2019/01/stan-and-ollie-movie-review-laurel-and-hardy-rex-reed/
New Laurel and Hardy review up (linked below) and we are now done with their shorts. We have nine features ahead, the 8 Roach films plus THE FLYING DEUCES from RKO. At this point in time, as much as I'd like to, I won't be doing the Fox and MGM films unless if somebody steps forward, says they have access and will definitely chip in. After SAPS AT SEA is done, we're probably done with Laurel and Hardy and I haven't decided what I'm doing next. At the very least though, nine more features to go and it's a cool batch of films.http://moronika.com/forums/index.php/topic,6060.msg54291.html#new
You know what, replies or no replies, I'll review Laurel and Hardy until the end, I'm noticing everything is getting a lit of views regardless. So I think we have 18 more films to go now.Sam, if NOTHING BUT TROUBLE is all you've seen post Roach, you've seen the worst. It gets better from there.
Ahhh, while most tend to agree with that assessment, count me in the minority who doesn't consider NOTHING BUT TROUBLE (1944) the absolute worst among Laurel and Hardy's 1941-45 Post Hal Roach Features. Just my opinion.CHEERS!