I'm not saying it's not a good movie, but why does it even need to be on Blu Ray? It's not like they had high-def equipment to film with back then. Is there some detail on the original master that standard DVDs can't hold? I'm sure a Blu Ray disc can hold more extras than a DVD, but that's about the only advantage for live action films made prior to high definition technology. As far as I know, picture quality would be about the same as it would on DVD. The sort of films that benefit most in terms of picture are animation and newer films.