Did they finally get Bin Laden ?

And you're Dunrobin and I'm not.

It took 10 yrs to get that motherfucker, and the down side of it is now he will reap his reward of an eternity of boffing his 23 virgins.

JazzBill · **Reply #7 on:** May 02, 2011, 03:20:47 PM

Quote from: Boid Brain on May 02, 2011, 09:24:08 AM

And you're Dunrobin and I'm not.

It took 10 yrs to get that motherfucker, and the down side of it is now he will reap his reward of an eternity of boffing his 23 virgins.

Flying into Pakistan, landing in his house, killing the bastard and dragging him out is pretty impressive. You have to hand it to those special forces people, they did a hell of a job. A lot better than that botched up mess Carter gave us. I wonder if they really dumped in the sea, or do they have him strapped up somewhere using him for target practice?

shemps#1 · **Reply #8 on:** May 02, 2011, 04:18:23 PM

I'm not sure what Carter has to do with any of this since he hasn't been President since 1980.

X, Retard Bush promised he'd get bin Laden and failed, just goes to show politicians lie all the time.

ILMM · **Reply #9 on:** May 02, 2011, 04:48:04 PM

Quote from: shemps#1 on May 02, 2011, 04:18:23 PM

I'm not sure what Carter has to do with any of this since he hasn't been President since 1980.

X, Retard Bush promised he'd get bin Laden and failed, just goes to show politicians lie all the time.

He's refering to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Claw
And to your second point; I don't see how Bush promising to get Bin Laden and failing counts as a "lie",
unless you think that Bush purposely didn't get him, but that makes no sense whatsoever.
Darn! My link didn't work again; I can't understand it.

Boid Brain · **Reply #10 on:** May 02, 2011, 05:05:28 PM

That clusterfuck with the Helicopters wasn't Carters Fault. It was the military's.

Anyway, I just learned that it was a "kill" mission....those Navy Seals killed the bastard in cold blood like a mangy dog!

shemps#1 · **Reply #11 on:** May 02, 2011, 05:25:14 PM

I seriously wonder if Bush purposely didn't get him, and it makes more sense than you think considering the Chaney/Halliburton connection and the proverbial jizz stains that the Bush family has on their collective lips from sucking off Mid-East oil kings. Perhaps "purposely didn't get him" isn't the right wording: maybe it should be "didn't try very hard". Bush could have gotten him if he didn't use 9/11 as an excuse to go into Iraq for no good reason. And don't give me any bullshit about "liberating the Iraqi people" or "eliminating a threat". First it's not our business to "liberate" these foreign countries (and I couldn't give a shit about the Iraqi people) and second Saddam was no threat to us as we found out. Besides, it wouldn't be the first (or only) thing Bush lied about: if you remember he tried to position himself as a centrist during his first campaign against Gore only to show his true colors as a right-wing Jesus Freak nutjob once 9/11 hit. Let's not also forget the whole "we have proof that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction" bit.

I don't care what religion you are, any President who claims that they have personally "spoken to God" needs to be in a white padded room, not the White House. And don't get me wrong, I am no left-wing lover or waving a flag with a jackass on it: I have equal contempt for both parties and have not been a fan of Obama's administration. However, they got the job done that Bush couldn't (or wouldn't) do.

Boid Brain · **Reply #12 on:** May 02, 2011, 05:51:02 PM

Look's like the "kill mission" stuff was wrong. Evening news say it was a shootout.

As far as Bush not really trying to get him: I don't buy it. Bush is an idiot, but he is also a Texan. He wants those cocksuckers dead like every other American. We got Sadam on his watch, didn't we?

Osama was much harder to locate. Too many places of refuge in that sprawling desert. Plus he began his hiding weeks before 9-11. Well, both belong to the ages now.

Some are speculating mucho terrorist retaliation to come.....oy vey.

JazzBill · **Reply #13 on:** May 02, 2011, 06:17:32 PM

Quote from: shemps#1 on May 02, 2011, 04:18:23 PM

I'm not sure what Carter has to do with any of this since he hasn't been President since 1980.

I'm talking about a failed rescue attempt to get the 52 hostages out of Iran on April 24th 1980. We lost 2 aircraft and 8 servicemen were killed in the attempt. And I blame it on Carter. As a matter of fact I blame a lot of the shit going on today on Carter. He let them Iranian militants hold those hostages for 444 days. If he would of done more to stop them back then, things might be different today. Carter had no balls and he made the US look weak. Thats just my opinion.

vomit · **Reply #14 on:** May 02, 2011, 06:20:13 PM

Quote from: shemps#1 on May 02, 2011, 05:25:14 PM

I seriously wonder if Bush purposely didn't get him, and it makes more sense than you think considering the Chaney/Halliburton connection and the proverbial jizz stains that the Bush family has on their collective lips from sucking off Mid-East oil kings. Perhaps "purposely didn't get him" isn't the right wording: maybe it should be "didn't try very hard". Bush could have gotten him if he didn't use 9/11 as an excuse to go into Iraq for no good reason. And don't give me any bullshit about "liberating the Iraqi people" or "eliminating a threat". First it's not our business to "liberate" these foreign countries (and I couldn't give a shit about the Iraqi people) and second Saddam was no threat to us as we found out. Besides, it wouldn't be the first (or only) thing Bush lied about: if you remember he tried to position himself as a centrist during his first campaign against Gore only to show his true colors as a right-wing Jesus Freak nutjob once 9/11 hit. Let's not also forget the whole "we have proof that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction" bit.

I don't care what religion you are, any President who claims that they have personally "spoken to God" needs to be in a white padded room, not the White House. And don't get me wrong, I am no left-wing lover or waving a flag with a jackass on it: I have equal contempt for both parties and have not been a fan of Obama's administration. However, they got the job done that Bush couldn't (or wouldn't) do.

I concur 100%. great post.

shemps#1 · **Reply #15 on:** May 02, 2011, 06:48:40 PM

Quote from: Boid Brain on May 02, 2011, 05:51:02 PM

Look's like the "kill mission" stuff was wrong. Evening news say it was a shootout.

As far as Bush not really trying to get him: I don't buy it. Bush is an idiot, but he is also a Texan. He wants those cocksuckers dead like every other American. We got Sadam on his watch, didn't we?

Osama was much harder to locate. Too many places of refuge in that sprawling desert. Plus he began his hiding weeks before 9-11. Well, both belong to the ages now.

Some are speculating mucho terrorist retaliation to come.....oy vey.

Got Saddam for what? What did he ever do to the US? Nothing! Bush should have went after bin Laden but instead used 9/11 to go into Iraq. I thought I was clear in my last post. If Bush hadn't been fucking about in Iraq for NO GOOD REASON he would have gotten bin Laden as he had plenty of time to do so and it's not like Osama was hiding in a hole somewhere. They got him outside his $1 million mansion for fuck's sake.

xraffle · **Reply #16 on:** May 02, 2011, 07:00:33 PM

I'm not really sure if I'm happy about this news though. This puts us at a higher risk of another terrorist attack. And what's worse is that I bet they'll attack when we least expect it. I, personally, think that killing Bin Laden only provoked the situation, not make it better.

dud · **Reply #17 on:** May 02, 2011, 07:46:50 PM

I would have never expected a thread like this on a Stooges forum ... the Stooges were all about entertainment and making people laugh.

Talking "politics" like this would have been prime comedy fodder for the stooges.

shemps#1 · **Reply #18 on:** May 02, 2011, 08:00:25 PM

This is the General Discussion section of the forum: Stooge talk and non-Stooge talk is allowed as evidenced by the myriad of posts that are political, sports, movie related and more. If you don't like then beg the person holding a gun to your head and forcing you to read this thread to stop.

JazzBill · **Reply #19 on:** May 02, 2011, 08:20:09 PM

Quote from: shemps#1 on May 02, 2011, 06:48:40 PM

Got Saddam for what? What did he ever do to the US? Nothing! Bush should have went after bin Laden but instead used 9/11 to go into Iraq. I thought I was clear in my last post. If Bush hadn't been fucking about in Iraq for NO GOOD REASON he would have gotten bin Laden as he had plenty of time to do so and it's not like Osama was hiding in a hole somewhere. They got him outside his $1 million mansion for fuck's sake.

All that talk about WMD was bullshit. They didn't find a thing. I think he just wanted to go and finish his daddy's war. I can still see him in his little uniform on that ship saying "Mission accomplished". Yeah right, eight years later and we're not out of there.

JazzBill · **Reply #20 on:** May 02, 2011, 08:31:29 PM

Quote from: Boid Brain on May 02, 2011, 05:05:28 PM

Anyway, I just learned that it was a "kill" mission....those Navy Seals killed the bastard in cold blood like a mangy dog!

Of coarse it was a kill mission. Why would they want to bring him back alive? Think of all the money costs and problems that would cause.

JazzBill · **Reply #21 on:** May 02, 2011, 08:54:19 PM

Quote from: dud on May 02, 2011, 07:46:50 PM

Talking "politics" like this would have been prime comedy fodder for the stooges

I believe the Stooges dabbled a little in political satire. Moe played a pretty good Hitler in You Nazty Spy and I'll Never Heil Again.

ILMM · **Reply #22 on:** May 03, 2011, 12:27:22 AM

Quote from: JazzBill on May 02, 2011, 08:20:09 PM

All that talk about WMD was bullshit. They didn't find a thing. I think he just wanted to go and finish his daddy's war. I can still see him in his little uniform on that ship saying "Mission accomplished". Yeah right, eight years later and we're not out of there.

Oh puu-lease, If all the WMDs were made up for the purpose of a sham war, why didn't they plant fake WMDS
that they could have "found"? What's your answer for that?

JazzBill · **Reply #23 on:** May 03, 2011, 12:36:13 AM

Quote from: ILMM on May 03, 2011, 12:27:22 AM

Oh puu-lease, If all the WMDs were made up for the purpose of a sham war, why didn't they plant fake WMDS
that they could have "found"? What's your answer for that?

Then where the fuck are they?

shemps#1 · **Reply #24 on:** May 03, 2011, 12:47:29 AM

It's a well known fact that Iraq had no WMDs, which makes your statement all the more idiotic. You can be a Republican fanboy all you want but face the facts: Bush was a terrible President.

Did they finally get Bin Laden ?

xraffle

xraffle