If I may elaborate a little on the Stooges comparison, I believe Kevin James is a Three Stooges fan, and he wanted to add an element of the Stooges into 'Paul Blart', and I think he succeeded.
Granted, it's not high art, definitely not Chaplin, but then again, Chaplin indulged in a lot of slapstick, and there are elements of Chaplinesque pathos in the Blart character being a poor schlub everyman who finds himself in an unusual situation and manages to come out on top in the end. The slapstick in the film is 'cointenly' on the level of the Stooges, and that's part of the charm that I think makes the film work. Just think of Blart as Ralph Kramden or Curly on a Segway and that might give you a better idea about the movie.
I read an online review of a guy who had absolutely no intention of seeing the movie, but his 9 year old son really wanted to see it, so he sucked it up and took him hoping he could manage to stay awake, and was pleasantly surprised to find how funny it was and how much he enjoyed it.
Kevin James basically wanted to make a family friendly version of 'Die Hard', so you won't hear any 'Yippie Tie Yi Aye, Mother*****r!' in it, and that's ok. It's a fun, silly movie to take the kids to without worrying about them seeing anything ojectional in it. It reminds me of the shorts where the Stooges through sheer dumb luck manage to outwit a gang of crooks.
If you don't want to see the movie, no one is twisting your arm. (Though I may reach down your throat and pull out your tonsils and make you wear them as a bow tie!) But if you like Stooge-style slapstick comedy, you might enjoy the 'Paul Blart' movie which carries on the Stooge tradition in a fun way.
Now, spread-out Grapehead, or I'll give you the new fingers.
Hey, those are the old fingers.
They'll Do!
<POKE>
Oh! Oh!