What happened? 40 years or so of corruption, greed, gross mismanagement, the people themselves doing stupid things like electing brainless movie actors to high office, family political dynasties such as the Kennedys and the Bushes (virtual "royalty," which we aren't supposed to have here), etc., etc.
And what— only a generation ago— was the region of America that was the manufacturing powerhouse of the world, is now known as the "Rust Belt," which I think is the greatest shame of all. Our industrial capacity was this country's single greatest strength, and our half-wit "leaders" in both government and business let it all go right down the old crapper. Republican, Democrat, it
doesn't matter, they were all bought off and they all sold out.
It's a very long list indeed... I could go on and on. But the question I want to ask here is, were "The Good Old Days" really that much better? In some ways yes, and in some ways
no, I'd say.
For example, I don't think that any sane black American would want to go back to 1946, or even 1956. Also, medicine and dentistry were both primitive and painful, and sometimes fatal in the past; even procedures that are now considered routine. Organized religion controlled practically everyone's lives, in one way or another. There were no home computers (the early vacuum-tube models were the size of a small house, and less powerful than what you have on your desk right now), there was a brutal war followed by a worldwide depression followed by an even
more brutal war—
Again, it's a long list. But getting back to how much of your personal income you're permitted to keep, here's a lament about that very subject, from 1920. "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
[attachment deleted by admin]